Participation of non-specialists in scientific research is a crucial component of citizen science. Within the confines of the project's structures, the citizen participates as an observer or experimenter. The development of enabling technology, which is typified by the spatially-enabled "smart" phone with mapping applications and its accompanying networks, including the GPS system, is to blame for the current growth in initiatives. Two goals of citizen science initiatives are to increase the impact of scientific research and to increase public acceptance of and understanding of science. The OPAL Soil and Earthworm Survey, GLOBE, and mySoil are current citizen scientific efforts, although they are not intended for soil mapping. We identify the categories of citizens who might be inspired to participate in such activities and propose digital soil mapping (DSM) citizen science initiatives for nations with and without well-organized extension and advisory services and existing soil surveys. Tactic knowledge, opportunistic or protocol-guided new information, information from precision agriculture, and tangible samples sent for analysis are all examples of contributions. The professional mapper who uses digital data to create or improve soil property or type maps would be the main beneficiary of such initiatives. The citizen scientist, who would gain from an improved map, would be the secondary beneficiary. would be the citizen scientist, who would gain from a more accurate map and might be better equipped to participate in discussions about soil resource policy. Participation would also improve the connection between the citizen and the soil resource. presence and acceptance rates of manuscripts with hypotheses were examined in seven top soil journals. The study's objectives were to measure soil science hypothesis testing and look into how it changed over time. The journals were Applied Soil Ecology, Biochemistry and Fertility of Soils, Geoderma, Plant and Soil, European Journal of Soil Science, and Soil & Tillage Research. Over that time, the seven journals collectively published 15,344 pieces. 74% of the 620 papers in the sample evaluated one hypothesis, 20% tested two or more, and 6% presented a hypothesis. n = 783) of the tested hypotheses were accepted in total, and the acceptance rate for the seven journals was 66% (Teuber M et al ., 2001).
Share this article