International Research Journals
Reach Us +44 330 818 7254

International Research Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Review Article - International Research Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology ( 2023) Volume 11, Issue 2

Applications on Drug delivery system to the lungs

Rafael Forbes*
Department of pharmaceutics, King’s College London, UK
*Corresponding Author:
Rafael Forbes, Department of pharmaceutics, King’s College London, UK, Email:

Received: 01-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. IRJPP-23-96314; Editor assigned: 03-Apr-2023, Pre QC No. IRJPP-23-96314(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Apr-2023, QC No. IRJPP-23-96314; Revised: 21-Apr-2023, Manuscript No. IRJPP-23-96314(R); Published: 29-Apr-2023, DOI: 10.14303/2251-0176.2023.69


One of the most logical drug treatments for lung cancer is arguably direct inhalation-based delivery to the lung. However, this strategy has not progressed in clinical trials despite significant investments and efforts in this area. Understanding and developing novel drug delivery strategies are made easier with the help of imaging drug delivery. In this survey we center on imaging investigations of medication conveyance by the inward breath course, to give an expansive outline of the field to date and endeavor to more readily comprehend the intricacies of this course of organization and the critical boundaries that it faces, as well as its benefits. We begin by discussing the particular difficulties associated with inhalation-based drug delivery to the lung. We focus on the obstacles that have stymied this approach's progress in oncology and the most recent developments in this field. This is trailed by an exhaustive outline of the different imaging modalities that are pertinent to lung drug conveyance, including atomic imaging, X-beam imaging, attractive reverberation imaging, optical imaging and mass spectrometry imaging.


Cellular breakdown in the lungs is the most widely recognized reason for malignant growth passing, with just 1 of every 10 individuals enduring the illness more than 10 years in England. It is additionally disheartening that endurance rates for cellular breakdown in the lungs have not superior over the most recent 40 years, featuring the clinical requirement for further developed treatment choices. The most common treatment for primary lung cancer is chemotherapy, usually administered intravenously with cis/carboplatin and other cytotoxic drugs like docetaxel and etoposide (Holden MG et al., 2013). It is well known that administering untargeted drugs via intravenous route results in a suboptimal accumulation in the disease tissue and severe patient side effects due to the drug's systemic exposure or accumulation in healthy tissues. In light of this, inhaling therapeutic drugs directly into the lung appears to be the most logical approach to treating lung cancer; however, attempts to make use of this strategy have not been successful in clinical trials (Warny M et al., 2005).

A promising strategy for treating localized lung cancer is pulmonary drug delivery. This non-invasive route of drug delivery has numerous advantages that could be used for efficient and effective lung cancer therapy Localized chemotherapy has been relatively successful against various types of cancer, including colorectal, ovarian, and brain cancers (Kuijper EJ et al., 2006) (LeroyJ et al., 2011). By administering drugs directly to the lungs, the drug is delivered directly to the target tissue, avoiding first-pass metabolism and plasma binding and systemic distribution. As compounds can be deposited topically on or close to tumor because hypoxic environments favour invasive and more resistant cancer cells, poorly or non-vascularized tumors may require even higher doses of drug (Slekovec C et al., 2014) (Peterson LR 2005). The inhalation route enables smaller doses to be delivered to achieve equivalent lung exposure compared to systemic routes of administration, thereby reducing the toxicity associated with the exposure of non-target organs to anticancer drugs. Although inhaled delivery offers clear pharmacokinetic advantages with significantly reduced side effects compared to systemic delivery, some important challenges have been highlighted from those studies. These challenges include (i) anatomical challenges (such as lung anatomy and physiology), (ii) technical specifications (such as inhalation device, formulation strategies, physicochemical properties of drugs, administration time, local contamination), (iii) disease stage (such as tumor size, localisation, partial or complete airway obstruction), and These factors are crucial in determining whether aerosolized drug delivery is a viable and/or efficient treatment option for lung cancer(Langford BJ et al., 2016).

The primary intricacy and unavailability of the fringe lung airspaces, and contending freedom pathways make the inward breath course more intricate for drug conveyance than most different courses of administration. The destiny of respirable particles relies upon their testimony site and physicochemical properties. Just the small amount of the discharged portion from an inward breath gadget that passes the windpipe is conveyed to the lower aviation routes (Peterjack LR 2006). The characteristics of the inhaler device, the breathing profile of the patient, and the properties of the aerosol particles such as their shape and aerodynamic diameter of less than 5 micrometers) all play a role in determining this fraction. Respirable particles can be eliminated from the lungs once they have been deposited by absorption into the systemic circulation, mucociliary clearance, macrophage phagocytosis, or enzyme degradation. Diseases like asthma can cause narrowed bronchioles, tumors can block the airways, cystic fibrosis can cause thick, sticky mucosal airways, and bacterial infections can cause inflamed airways. All of these conditions make it harder to deliver drugs through the airways (Downing M et al., 2018). In order to achieve optimal drug deposition in the lungs' target site, the inhaler must be used correctly and have the right aerosol characteristics because these barriers can reduce the amount of dose that reaches the targeted organ.

Nebulisers produce droplet aerosols with particle sizes below 5 m that patients can inhale while maintaining normal breathing, despite the fact that there are many different kinds of inhalation devices currently in use in clinical settings. To date, however, only nebulisation systems (e.g., ultrasonic wave, jet, vibrating mesh, breath-enhanced jet) have been utilized in pilot studies and clinical trials to administer inhaled anticancer compounds In addition, during the inhalation process, a significant portion of the aerosol is lost in the air (for instance, jet nebulisers can have losses of 50%, with only 10% of the initial dose deposited in the lungs), which brings additional complications in terms of potential exposure of caregivers and bystanders, particularly in the case of cytotoxic drugs. The two main challenges that nebulisers face are increasing efficiency and portability. For example, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 250 mg/5 mL requires delivery twice a day for 15 minutes and cisplatin at a dose of 1 mg/mL requires delivery three times a day for 20 minutes each. This results in airborne environmental contamination that necessitates the use of protective equipment (such as a respirator face mask, safety glasses, gloves, cap, etc.) as well as time- and resource-consuming procedures Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have been suggested as better solutions to these problems because they can deliver relatively large doses (up to 400 mg) in a single inhalation effort and reduce airborne contamination. Additionally, powder formulations are better suited to poorly water-soluble compounds because they are more stable than liquid formulations. However, deposited dose effectiveness in the lungs is dependent on the patient's inspiratory airflow, which is another potential cause of variation between patients. Up until this point, just a set number of pilot studies have researched the utilization of DPI gadgets to convey cytotoxic chemotherapeutic medications.

Because it has major implications for effective drug deposition in the lungs and the ability of drugs to reach the site of action, the impact of tumor stage/progression on respiratory airflow requires greater investigation. A major concern in inhaled drug delivery is the potential for local adverse effects to develop during drug exposure. In silico modeling has shown that the obstruction of the airways by tumors, depending on the position, might reduce the flow rate and thereby significantly impact the deposition efficacy, as the majority of particles were deposited in the upper airways (Yoseph H et al., 2016). It is essential to employ non-invasive methods for evaluating deposition because the inhaled drug delivery method may result in dose variability. In clinical trials, this is crucial so that the therapeutic effect of drugs can be correlated with the actual amount of drug deposited. This is especially important for drugs with narrow therapeutic indexes and a delayed therapeutic effect. Nonimaging methods based on "downstream" fluid sampling (such as blood or urine) after the drug has left the lungs cannot distinguish between the drug that is inhaled and swallowed, nor can they indicate the regional deposition within the lungs. Planar scintigraphy studies of aerosol deposition, in particular, were crucial in demonstrating the heterogeneity and interindividual variability of deposition patterns and greatly aided in the design of more effective inhalers.

An interesting preclinical study of inhaled dry powder vaccine formulations showed that an influenza vaccine formulation led to an increase in serum IgG levels irrespective of the deposition pattern – shown by fluorescence imaging – in the airways, whereas for hepatitis B (a blood-borne disease), the IgG levels only increased after deposition deeper in the lungs and, presumably, systemic absorption. This demonstrates the importance of tailoring drug delivery to the mechanism of action of Imaging techniques that are able to monitor the drug's progress after deposition are especially useful in this regard. Even though this is true for a lot of the imaging techniques that are currently used in the clinic, recent advancements have made it easier to quantify images based on them. Progresses in lung X-ray, further examined in Area 3.d of this survey, presently permit outright measurement of differentiation specialists in the lungs, albeit this remains non-unimportant. Current calculations for single-photon discharge processed tomography (SPECT) can all the more effectively measure the recognized signals. PET imaging specifically gives a solution to this test, as it permits direct evaluation of medications in different organs, all the while and with adequate fleeting goal to empower pharmacokinetic review to be led. This will only get better with the development of total-body PET, which will enable high sensitivity quantitative imaging of the entire body.


The authors declare that they have no known competing interests.




  1. Holden MG,Hsu LY,Kurt K,Weinert LA,Mather AE (2013).A genomic portrait of the emergence, evolution, and global spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pandemic. Genome Res.23(4): 653-664.
  2.  Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Warny M,Pepin J,Fang A,Killgore J,Thompson A (2005).Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet.366(9491):1079-1084.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Kuijper EJ,Coignard B,Tüll P (2006).Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe .Clin Microbiol Infect.12(5):2-18.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. LeroyJ,Patry I,Faure C,Ariskina E,Gaume JP(2011). Audit régional de l’usage des fluoroquinolones à l’hôpital et en ville: y a-t-il une surconsommation de ces antibiotiques. Pathol Biol.59(5): 103-107.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Slekovec C,Leroy J,Huttner A,Ruyer O,Talon D(2014).When the precautionary principle disrupts 3 years of antibiotic stewardship: nitrofurantoin in the treatment of urinary tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother.69(1):282-284.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Peterson LR (2005).Squeezing the antibiotic balloon: the impact of antimicrobial classes on emerging resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect.11(4):4-16.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Langford BJ,Seah J,Chan A,Downing V,Johnstone J (2016). Antimicrobial stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: impact of selective susceptibility reporting on Ciprofloxacin utilization and susceptibility of gram-negative isolates to Ciprofloxacin in a hospital setting. J Clin Microbiol.54(9): 2343-2347
  14.  Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Peterjack LR (2006).Squeezing the antibiotic balloon: the impact of antimicrobial classes on emerging resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect.11(5): 4-16.
  16.  Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Downing M,Johnstone J (2018).Antimicrobial stewardship in the microbiology laboratory: impact of selective susceptibility reporting on Ciprofloxacin utilization and susceptibility of gram-negative isolates to Ciprofloxacin in a hospital setting. J Clin Microbiol.54(9):2343-2347.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Yoseph H,Hussein K,Braun H,Paul M (2016).Natural history and decolonization strategies for ESBL/carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae carriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother.71(10): 2729-2739.
  20.  Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref