Perspective - Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences ( 2022) Volume 13, Issue 2
Received: 09-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. JMMS-22-62545; Editor assigned: 11-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. JMMS-22-62545 (PQ); Reviewed: 25-Mar-2022, QC No. JMMS-22-62545; Revised: 29-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. JMMS-22-62545 (R); Published: 05-Apr-2022, DOI: 10.14303/jmms.13.2.15
In many clinical situations, causal reasoning involves explaining the etiology, diagnostic considerations, and prognostic discussions. This article outlines a philosophical explanation of causality that may not be familiar to busy clinicians, but is still evaluated. In our discussion, we are not trying to simplify a fairly complex set of ideas. It begins with an introduction to some important basic ideas, followed by two sections on the metaphysical and epistemological aspects of causality. These sections explain in more detail some of its particular philosophical aspects, using examples drawn from obstetrics and gynecology research and practice.
The field of obstetrics and gynecology is constantly updated with the latest research results. In the age of readily available research publications, there are many challenges in interpreting obstetrics and gynecology literature. Common pitfalls include excessive reliance on dichotomized P-values, lack of transparency, biased research reports, limited resources, lack of standardized practices and results in study design, and rare data alignment. Includes sexual concerns.
Approximately 45 obstetric studies are published each year in the most influential journals, a quarter in weekly medical journals and the rest in obstetrics and gynecology journals. Only about one-third of published obstetric studies are positive. The studies published in the Weekly Medical Journal are larger and are likely to be government-funded, multicenter, international, and double-blind. Quality indicators are similar in the Weekly Medical Journal and the OB / GYN Journal.
There is a chronic shortage of obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan. In order to increase the number of obstetricians and gynecologists, it is important to increase the number of residents hired. The purpose of this study was to use a questionnaire survey to identify the factors that led students and internships to specialize in obstetrics and gynecology.
The field of obstetrics and gynecology (OB / GYN) faces intensifying competition for young professionals in Germany and is of great interest among female graduates, choosing to pursue further education in this field. The percentage of male students who do is decreasing. The purpose of this study is to analyze general and gender-dependent factors that influence the decision to agree or disagree with the professional training of gynecologists and obstetrics in German medical students.
Recent evidence suggests that detection of discrepancies and cytological histological correlation (CHC) can assess errors and improve the sensitivity and specificity of cytological methods. Our aim was to analyze the errors of cytopathological- histological discrepancies according to the American Society of Cytopathology CHC Protocol Guidelines (2017). This retrospective study included 273 patients examined at the National Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine (Moscow, Russia) between January 2019 and September 2021.
Description of the clinical profile of minimally invasive surgery performed in gynecology at the National Referral Hospital in Bhutan. A review of such procedures performed in gynecology was needed to evaluate the basic information and collect our own experience. A descriptive study was conducted to review hospital records of minimally invasive surgery performed in gynecology from January 1st to December 31st, 2020.
RS is a non-specific property that makes it difficult to diagnose preoperatively. In specialized gynecological clinics, it is more important to distinguish between benign and malignant masses before surgery. Surgical complete resection of the tumor is recommended, and recurrence after complete resection is rare.
None
We have no conflict of interests to disclose and the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors.