GET THE APP

International Research Journals
Reach Us +443308187254

Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Editorial - Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology ( 2022) Volume 11, Issue 6

An analysis of the environmental effects of waste plastic contaminants

Marta Fernandez Batalla*
 
Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, Iran
 
*Corresponding Author:
Marta Fernandez Batalla, Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, Iran, Email: parwe@yahoo.com

Received: 31-Oct-2022, Manuscript No. JREST-22-83539; Editor assigned: 02-Nov-2022, Pre QC No. JREST-22-83539 (PQ); Reviewed: 16-Nov-2022, QC No. JREST-22-83539; Revised: 21-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. JREST-22-83539 (R); Published: 28-Nov-2022, DOI: 10.14303/2315-5698.2022.12

Abstract

As the topic of how to dispose of plastic at its end of life continues to be discussed on a global scale, the discovery of plastic by humans is quickly becoming a challenge. This discussion arises from a number of findings that, when plastic waste is disposed of improperly, the additives in plastic harm marine and terrestrial life by contributing to organic pollutants. In sub-Saharan Africa, where there is a growing population, managing waste in general and plastic waste in particular is a constant challenge. The majority of plastic waste is either burned openly or disposed of in open spaces or landfills, where additives pollute the environment, with only 15–25% of it recycled. Additionally, some of the waste enters global water networks through estuaries and continues to harm humans through the food chain. In order to draw attention to the detrimental effects that plastic waste pollution has on the health and environment in sub- Saharan Africa, this article conducts a literature review and makes a number of mitigation recommendations 

PLASTIC POLLUTION

As the topic of how to dispose of plastic at its end of life continues to be discussed on a global scale, the discovery of plastic by humans is quickly becoming a challenge. This discussion arises from a number of findings that, when plastic waste is disposed of improperly, the additives in plastic harm marine and terrestrial life by contributing to organic pollutants. In sub-Saharan Africa, where there is a growing population, managing waste in general and plastic waste in particular is a constant challenge. The majority of plastic waste is either burned openly or disposed of in open spaces or landfills, where additives pollute the environment, with only 15–25% of it recycled. Additionally, some of the waste enters global water networks through estuaries and continues to harm humans through the food chain. In order to draw attention to the detrimental effects that plastic waste pollution has on the health and environment in sub- Saharan Africa, this article conducts a literature review and makes a number of mitigation recommendations (Hughes SR et al., 2013).

The Greek word "plastikos," which means "a material or element that can keep its form in a variety of applications," is where we get the word "plastic." Long-chain polymer molecules make up plastic, which is an extract and byproduct of coal, petroleum, and natural gas. At least 43% of its waste either burns openly or ends up in landfills or the ocean (Ternes TA et al., 1998). Due to its lethal additives, plastic may take up to 500 years to degrade, according to researchers like and others. In spite of this obstacle, plastic consumption continues to rise by at least 5% annually, reaching 150 million tons annually worldwide. Additionally, the additive in plastic has an effect on humans and the ecosystem when used-up plastics are contaminated and disposed of, thereby continuing to contribute to organic pollutants. Additionally, due to their hydrophobic nature, many of these additives have the potential to contaminate marine life Oaks JL et al., 2004).

Africa is home to numerous aquatic habitats, including the Great Lakes, Lake Chad, the Congo, Niger, and Nile rivers, as well as estuaries into international water networks (Sumpter JP et al., 1995). In the mean time, the district is viewed as a main supporter of the largescale plastic contamination of marine frameworks, with Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, South Africa, and Algeria positioning seventh, 10th, 11th, and thirteenth in a worldwide positioning of 192 nations in plastic waste age, separately. contends that the majority of regions appear to lack major institutionalized plastic methods and techniques, implying that the African state may continue to worsen global plastic pollution. provides an overview of the plastic waste that rivers release into the oceans(Keller VDJ et al., 2014).

Despite the fact that plastics have significant advantages over other materials in terms of low manufacturing costs, weight, and durability. Numerous toxic chemicals are present in the additive, and they have the potential to dissipate as microplastic pollutants, which can result in severe respiratory problems as well as other health and environmental issues (Gunnarsson L et al., 2012). The presence of microplastics in the ecosystem is a sign of the rapid and unabated increase in the production of plastic and the improper disposal of plastic waste, as well as the fact that numerous processes, such as the disposal of domestic waste, maritime activities, drainage, agricultural runoff, and so on, contribute to its environmental pollution. In addition, human beings are constantly exposed to microplastics through inhalation, ingestion, and contact with the skin (Cooper ER et al., 2008). The microplastic's toxic substance can cause oxidative stress and inflammation, which can disrupt immune function, cause neoplasia, increased particle translocation, and neurotoxicity. Dioxins, for instance, are fatal organic pollutants that plastic polymers produce. They affect the development of the reproductive system, cause damage to the brain, and can cause cancer. However, it has been suggested that there is currently no conclusive evidence linking microplastic consumption to human health. Further research and more rigorous clinical studies are needed to investigate the potential effects of the microplastic contaminant on our health and the environment (Berninger JP et al., 2010) .

Babayemi listed various applications, including water bottles, containers, trash cans, washing basins, plastic cutlery, plates, kitchen utensils, baskets, furniture, toys, clothes, flip flops, and medical devices. Europe, China, and North America are the primary contributors to the surge in global plastic production. Although African states also manufacture plastic polymers for a variety of human uses, Europe, China, and North America are the primary donors. Cotta also said that many African countries are the ones that the majority of manufactured plastic products from industrialized countries use to import finished goods (Larsson DGJ et al., 2014).

The various sorts, properties, normal purposes, and effect of plastics are introduced. Plastic production continues unabated in the face of worldwide technological advancement and rapid economic expansion, resulting in an increase in pollution (Johnson AC et al., 2010).

REFERENCES

  1. Hughes SR, Kay P, Brown LE (2013). Global synthesis and critical evaluation of pharmaceutical data sets collected from river systems . Environ Sci Technol. 47: 661- 677.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Ternes TA (1998). Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers. Water Res. 32: 3245- 3260.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Oaks JL, Gilbert M (2004). Diclofenac residues as the cause of vulture population decline in Pakistan. Nature. 427: 630- 633.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Sumpter JP (1995). Vitellogenesis as a biomarker for estrogenic contamination of the aquatic environment. EHP. 103: 173-178.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Keller VDJ (2014). Worldwide estimation of river concentrations of any chemical originating from sewage-treatment plants using dilution factors. Environ Toxicol Chem. 33: 447- 452.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Gunnarsson L, Fick J (2012). Prioritising pharmaceuticals for environmental risk assessment: Towards adequate and feasible first-tier selection. Sci Total Environ. 421: 102-110.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Cooper ER (2008). Preliminary risk assessment database and risk ranking of pharmaceuticals in the environment. Sci Total Environ. 398: 26- 33.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Berninger JP, Brooks BW (2010). Leveraging mammalian pharmaceutical toxicology and pharmacology data to predict chronic fish responses to pharmaceuticals. Toxicol Lett. 193: 69-78.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Larsson DGJ (2014). Pollution from drug manufacturing: Review and perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci .369.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Johnson AC (2010)  Natural variations in flow are critical in determining concentrations of point source contaminants in rivers: An estrogen example. Environ. Sci. Technol.  44: 7865-7870.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref