GET THE APP

Sustainable Society 2020: Early Childhood Education | 47651
International Research Journals

Educational Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Sustainable Society 2020: Early Childhood Education

Abstract

Aref A. abou-aliand Armeen R. BAmeen

Thepurposeofthisresearchwastoexplorethedevelopmentofidentityandsocialinteractionswithinasecondgrade classroom.Specifically,genderwasatthefoundationofthisstudy.“Nooneisimmune.Sexrolesocializationanditseffectsare pervasive.Gendertraininghasbeenvariouslydescribedas“ubiquitous”,“omnirelevant”,and“primary”.Itmayalsobe inevitable.NochildseemstoavoidwhatZellaLuriareferredtoasthe“gendercurriculum”.Infact,typicallybyagethree,gender awarenessisferventlypresent,howeveritislikelythatgenderstereotypescanbemalleablewithadultinput.Assuchthisstudy specificallyinvestigatedthewayasecond-gradeteacherimplementedlessonsassociatedwithgenderstereotypeswithinthe regularcurriculum,inanattempttobeginimportantdiscussionsandthoughtfulnessrelatedtosex-rolestereotypes.

Tocreateanidentityforoneselfistopositiononeselfintheworldaroundthem;tofindaplacewhereoneseemsto“fit”in ourcommunities,familiesandvastlycomplexsocialsystem.Ouridentitiesareconstantlyevolvingaspeople;bothadultsand childrengrowandchangewithtimeandnewexperiences,andtheiridentitiesare“constructedthroughtheintersectionofmultiple dimensions”.Forinstance,anysingleperson’sidentityisinfluencedbyamultitudeoffactors,includingrace,ethnicity,religion, sex,sexuality,gender,familylife,communityinvolvement,socialclass,language,physicalandmentalability,health,agency, perceivedpowerandability,andeducation.Theresearcherswererecentlytoldbyanelementarystudentthatsheidentifiesas “atomboywhoisdarkerthanbothof[her]parents”.However,thisidentityistransientandmaychangeovertime.Itisgenerally believedthatindividualshavecompleteagencytochoosetheirownidentities,especiallyinademocraticcountryliketheUnited Stateswherepeoplemaylovewhomevertheychoose,worshipinachurchesoftheirchoosing,andspeakfreely.Theseindividual freedomsmaymakeitseemasifouridentitiescanbemoldedentirelyonourown,butduetowaysinwhichaliberalsociety maystillostracize,excludeandphysicallyharmpeopledeemeddifferent,especiallyintermsofgender,individualsarelimitedin choosingtheiridentitiesundercircumstancesbeyondtheircontrol.

Socialandculturalnormsdictatewhatnormalandacceptablebehavioris,andindividualsmustthendecidetoconformtothesenormstoacertaindegreeornot.Since“genderdevelopmentoccursinrelationtosomeoneorsomethingelse”studies haveshownthatchildrenlearnfromayoungagetointernalizegenderstereotypesthattheyareexposedtoathome,inthemedia, andfromteachersandpeersatschool.Itisdifficulttopinpointwhichinfluencemaybestrongestforyoungchildren,butina studyofAustralianfour-andfive-yearolds,maleandfemalechildrenwereabletowatchtelevisionclipsandsurmisethatmen wouldperformstereotypicallymasculineactivitiessuchasfixingcars,fightingfires,drivingtrucksandevenbecomingdoctors, whilemostchildrenguessedthatwomenwouldbetheonestosew,becomenurses,cookdinnerandwashdishes.Bothmale andfemalechildrenseemedtoholdamorerigidviewofmasculinity,fortheyansweredmoreoftenthatmenshouldcomplete thestereotypicallymasculinetasks,notbothsexes.Forthestereotypicallyfemaletasks,morechildrenansweredthateither womenorbothsexesmightcompletethetasks.Whenaskedabouttheirownabilitiestoperformeachofthesetaskswhenthey grewupiftheysodesired,four-year-oldchildrenofbothsexessawthemselvesascompetentinbothgenderedsetsoftasks,but five-year-oldfemalesexpresseddoubtthattheywouldbeabletoperformthemorestereotypicallymasculinetasksiftheywanted to.Thisresearchsuggeststhatyoungchildrenalreadyholdstrongideasaboutwhatmasculinityandfemininityentailbythetime theyenterkindergarten.Five-year-oldfemaleshavealreadyreceivedmessagesastowhichpartsofsocietytheirsexisexcluded from,as“theseparticipantsfeltthatsomemasculineactivitieswerenotlikelytobewithintheircompetence”.Identityformation istherebylimitedinchildren,astheylearntonavigate“oppressiveandexclusionarysystemsofgender”.

Eventhelanguagethatchildrenhaveavailabletodefinethemselvesintermsofgenderisextremelylimiting,asitfitsa rigid,binaryconstructofgenderthatforceschildrentochoosetoeitherbea“she”ora“he”.Almostallchildrenaregivena biologicallyassignedgenderatbirth,eveniftheyarebornintersex.Becausewestillliveinasocietywheretransgender,gender nonconformingandintersexpeopleareoftennotgrantedtherightsthattheydeserve,identityformationcanbeaverypainful processforchildrenwhoidentifyoutsideoftherigidconstructsthatwehaveofsexandgenderinoursociety,particularlywhen ourlanguagemayexcludethemfrombelongingtoarecognized,acceptedsocialgroup(i.e.“typical”boysandgirls). Significantly,inourcurrentsociety,nochildisimmunetowhatZellaLuriatermedthe“gendercurriculum”,whichimplicitly teachesandreinforcessex-rolesocialization.Adultsimposegenderonchildrenbeforetheyareevenborn,astheyanxiouslyask expectingparentswhichsextheirbabywillbe,andpresentthemwithpinkclothesforbabygirlsandblueclothesforbabyboys. Adultswillalsopickupgenderedtoyswhenplayingwithmaleandfemaleinfants,andoftenfeeluncomfortablewithknowing howtoaddressbabiesifthesexisnotimmediatelydiscernable.Thishasstrongimplicationsforteachersandparents,who mustbecomeawareofgenderstereotypesthattheyhaveinternalizedandfightagainstthesebiases,andstrongimplicationsfor childrenandstudents,whomustbetaughttorecognizeandactivelycounterthenegativeattentionthatgendernonconformity receivesinourworld.Examplesofgenderstereotypesthatchildreninternalizebeforeandshortlyafterenteringschoolinclude thefactthatbeingagirloraboycomeswithachecklistofthingsonemustdo“right”,andcompletingtheseitemsmakesitmore likelythatachildwillbetreatedfavorablybypeers.Forinstance,ayoungmalechildlovestowearpinkandcarrypurses,butthe nightbeforebeginningkindergarten,heswitcheshispinkcrocsoutforbluecross.

 

 

Share this article