International Research Journals

                                    Home    |    About Us          Journals          Contact Us          Search

International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science

International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science (ISSN:2251-0044)
IRJAS Home About IRJAS Call for Research Articles Submit Editorial Board Archive Guide to Authors

 
International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science Vol.2(1), pp. 046-050, January 2012    
Copyright © 2012 International Research Journals

 

 

 

Full Length Research Paper

 

Efficacy of topramezone and mesotrione for the control of annual grasses 

 

1Nader Soltani*, 2Allan C. Kaastra, 2Clarence J. Swanton, and 1Peter H. Sikkema

 

1Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1

2Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus, 120 Main Street East, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada, N0P 2C0

 

*Corresponding Author E-mail:  nsoltani@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca

 

Received 27 October, 2011; Accepted 28 November, 2011

 

 

        Abstract

 

Topramezone and mesotrione are two 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibiting herbicides used for broadleaf weed control in maize (Zea mays L.).  Limited research has been reported on these herbicides for the control of annual grasses.  Controlled environment experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy of topramezone (12.5 g ai ha-1) and mesotrione (100 g ai ha-1) on thirteen annual grass species at two development stages (2- to 3-leaf and 5- to 6-leaf).  Topramezone provided consistent control of Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. (barnyard grass), Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. (yellow foxtail), Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. (green foxtail), Setaria faberi Herrm. (giant foxtail), Panicum miliaceum L. (wild-proso millet), Cenchrus longispinus (Hack.) Fern. (longspine sandbur), and Panicum capillare L. (witchgrass) at both growth stages.  Mesotrione provided consistent control of Echinochloa crus-galli, Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Schreb. Ex Muhl. (smooth crabgrass), Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. (large crabgrass), and Panicum miliaceum at both growth stages.  Both herbicides suppressed Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. (fall panicum), but mesotrione also suppressed Setaria glauca, Cenchrus longispinus, Panicum capillare, and Bromus tectorum L. (downy brome).  Topramezone provided poor control of Bromus tectorum and Avena fatua L. (wild oat), and mesotrione provided poor control of Avena fatua, Setaria faberi, and Setaria viridis at both growth stages.  Increasing the growth stage of annual grasses generally did not alter the level of control by either herbicide.  However, the control level of Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) Vign. Ex Janchen (stinkgrass) decreased from control to suppression with increasing growth stage with both topramezone and mesotrione.  A similar decrease in the level of control was observed with topramezone on Digitaria ischaemum.  Based upon the control levels determined from this research, weed management practitioners can select the appropriate herbicide for annual grass control in individual fields. 

 

Keywords: Topramezone, mesotrione, HPPD-inhibiting, annual grasses, antagonism.

 

 

  Other Journals

  International Research Journal of Microbiology
  Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences
  International Research Journal of Geology and Mining
  African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacological Research
  Educational Research
  International Research Journal of Plant Science

 Int. Res. J. Agric. Sci. Soil Sci.


Vol. 2 No. 1


Viewing options:


 • Abstract
 • Full text
 •Reprint (PDF) (67 KB)

Search Pubmed for articles by:

 

Soltani N

Sikkema PH

 

Other links:


PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed

 

 

Advertise (IRJAS) | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Help


Copyright © International Research Journals 2012