Review Article - International Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences ( 2025) Volume 12, Issue 1
Received: 20-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. IRJASS-24-125526; Editor assigned: 22-Jan-2024, Pre QC No. IRJASS-24-125526 (PQ); Reviewed: 29-Jan-2024, QC No. IRJASS-24-125526; Revised: 22-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. IRJASS-24-125526 (R); Published: 29-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.14303/2276-6502.2025.31
Employment is fundamental pre-requisite to raise per capita income and eradicate household poverty. Poor employment opportunity is one of the key reasons for the endurance of poverty in India. After independence and particularly from the fifth five year plan onwards, Government of India has initiated several rural development programmers for raising rural employment for the alleviation of rural poverty. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is one amongst them. MGNREGA scheme is as a flagship program by the Government of India started on February 2, 2006. As per the Scheme, each rural household gets 100 days of guaranteed employment (unskilled works) every year. Although the major objective of this scheme is to provide livelihood security for rural households, it also facilitates the creation as well as maintenance of rural infrastructure and employment generation. The present paper is an attempt to overview the implementation and impact of MGNREGA on employment generation in rural India. It also examined the financial progress of MGNREGA and employment generated by this scheme. It not only provides security for food but also supports rural development. To perform the objective of the paper secondary data has been used.
NREGA/MGNREGA/MGNREGS, Convergence, BPL and APL household, Social capital, Scheme
The prevailing daily wage rate for manusssal labour in 2004 2005, it was necessary for at least three members of an agricultural labour household to get employment for more than 200 days in a year in order to maintain itself above the poverty level (Radhakrishna, 2005). We also noted that since in reality it is difficult for many households to get this much employment, the poverty level in rural households is still high (Nikhil et al., 2006). The ground reality continues to reveal disturbing trends (Ahmad et al., 1991). While the availability of food grains has come down in general (rural+urban) from about 510 grams in 1990-1991 to about 444 grams in 2009, the per capita consumption of food grains in rural households has declined relatively more from 373 grams in 1987-1988 to 313 grams in 2009-2010 (Mahendra, 1995). Further, besides a continued increase in the proportion of marginal farmers over time, among all the three classes of agricultural households (landless, marginal and small farmers), there is a significant income deficit (to a tune of 20 to 40%) to meet their minimum consumption needs (Puja et al., 2012). As a result, the rural households are indebted with the landless/marginal/small farmers segment being more dependent on informal lending sources to meet their minimum consumption needs (Khera et al., 2011). More specifically, while in the aggregate close to 50% of rural households are indebted, more than 60% of landless labour incur debt for meeting their consumption expenditure (Shah et al., 2008). The wages paid to rural labour are often far below the statutory minimum wage and are differentiated by gender, location and nature of work/activity (Bhatia et al., 2006). Due to these disturbing trends, the government in its mid-term appraisal of the Tenth Plan (2002-2007) raised serious concern on the ‘distress’ experienced by agricultural labourers and marginal/small farmers (Pankaj et al., 2010). The government has since taken many steps to mitigate their hardship experienced (Ashok, 2012). One of the notable initiatives of the government in the direction of providing guaranteed wage employment opportunities for rural unskilled manual labour was to enact a legislation The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, (NREGA) in August 23, 2005 (Kannan et al., 2012). The Act guarantees employment at statutory minimum wages for all those persons who sought manual unskilled labour for at least up to 100 days in a year (Suryamani, 2010).
Key processes in implementation
The process of implementation of the act/scheme works in stages as follows.
Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee scheme
It is pertinent to note here that three articles of the constitution of India have bearing on the right to work and these are listed in the directive principles of state policy. These three articles are:
Unemployment is a cause of poverty and generation of employment is central to eradicate poverty from rural India. The MGNREGS was launched in 2004 in 200 backward districts and later on extended to all the districts in the country in 2008. The mandate of the MGNREGA is to provide at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every rural household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. On 2nd October 2009 an amendment was made in the national rural employment guarantee act 2005, to rename the national rural employment guarantee act with the words the Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act (Table 1). The major differences between NREGA and MGNREGA are summarized below:
NREGA | MGNREGA |
The national rural employment guarantee act is the foundation for the Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act and provides guaranteed employment | The Mahatma Gandhi national rural employment guarantee act, created as directed in NREGA and the means to implement the act so that the guarantee comes into effect |
The central government specified the features and conditions for guaranteed employment in NREGA 2005 | The state governments have to incorporate all features of Mahatma Gandhi NREGA in the state Mahatma Gandhi NREGS as mentioned in schedule â??I and condition of employment as mentioned in schedule-II of Mahatma Gandhi NREGA |
The central government has powers to make rules and to amend NREGA | The state governments have powers to make rules and amend the concerned state act |
NREGA has been notified through the Gazette of India extraordinary notification and is national legislation. | Mahatma Gandhi NREGA of a state shall be notified through the official gazette of concerned state. |
Table 1. Differences between NREGA and MGNREGA.
Components of MGNREGS
Salient features of the MGNREGS Some of the salient features of MGNREGS are as follows:
Strategies of the MGNREGS Some of the strategies adopted are as follows:
Mandatory worksite facilities some of the mandatory work site facilities needed to be available in the work sites of MGNREGS are:
Gender related provisions:
Permissible works:
Cost sharing central GOVERNMENT has to pay for:
State governments have to pay for:
Social audits:
Decentralized planning and MGNREGS
Under the MGNREGS each district has been asked to prepare a district perspective plan. Customarily, the district plan will be an aggregate of block plans and block plan is the sum total of the village panchayat plans. In some states there are wards within the panchayat, then the district could have the ward plan and the panchayat plan is the aggregate of ward plans like Himachal Pradesh. The key to plan preparation is the panchayat plan, as panchayat is the main implementing agency of MGNREGS.
Importance of decentralized planning
In recent years decentralized planning i.e., planning below the national and subnational level has become an instrument for future development of the local areas in most of the democratic societies including India. Both the decentralized as well as the democratic planning go hand in hand for facilitating development in the democratic societies. The decentralized planning in a democratic society believes in multi-level planning at the sub-national government levels to facilitate maximum utilization of available local resources and manpower for the local development.
Some of the differences between the centralized and decentralized planning are:
The need for decentralized planning and development was felt in India in the first five-year plan (1951-1956), which advocated that there is a need to break the planning exercise into national, state, district, and local community levels. The two new components of decentralized planning came into picture in the Second Five Year Plan, namely, the establishment of the District Development Council and the drawing up of Village Plans. In 1969, the Planning Commission communicated guidelines to the states that to formulating district plans, encompassing the concept, the methodology and the detail drawing up plans within the framework of annual, medium term and perspective plans. The 39 Administrative Reforms Commission report (1967) highlighted that the district planning needed to be focused in those areas where local variations in the pattern and process of development were likely to yield quick results in terms of growth. M.L.Dantwala Committee (1978) also laid stress on Block Level Planning to form a link between village and district level planning. In 1984, Hanumantha Rao Committee recommended for decentralization of functions, powers and finances and setting up of district planning bodies and district planning cells.
District plan preparation
The first to prepare a district plan is to prepare a need-based village plan. The bottom-up approach is usually followed in the preparation of District Plan. At the outset, village plan or panchayat plan is prepared. The block plan is the sum total of panchayats plan. The district plan is the aggregate of block plans. The organization or individual involved in the preparation of the village plan has to involve and work in co ordination with the district and block administration and the functionaries of the line department in the district administration.
Steps in preparation of district plan
Step I: Village plan
Step II: Block plan
Step III: District plan
Village MGNREGS perspective plan
The village MGNREGS plan preparation is the key to the district plan. In North Indian states where one village plan is also called the panchayat plan. But in the southern state where each panchayat consists on an average seven to eight villages, the panchayat plan is the aggregate of village plans.
Strategy for village plan preparation
While preparing the village plan following points have to be kept in mind:
Process of village plan preparation following steps needed to be followed in the process of village plan preparation:
Orientation about grassroots planning
The following people functionaries and community based organization may be oriented about the importance of grassroots planning:
The important topics to be covered in the orientation programme are:
Collection of data both primary and secondary data to be collected for the preparation of village plan:
Primary data: The primary data have to be collected on following aspects:
Secondary data: The secondary data for the village plan will be collected from following sources:
Conduction of gram sabha:
Prioritizing the needs through PRA one small working group must be constituted who will conduct PRA and perform following functions:
Report writing
The report on the district perspective plan, MGNREGS needs to have following six chapters and an executive summery. The chapters are discussed below:
Executive summary: It would give a brief of the plan with objectives, methodology, physical and financial mapping.
Chapter I: Introduction
The introduction will contain the information about the district. Information from various secondary sources has to be collected for writing this chapter. The information will cover aspects such as demography, caste-wise and religion wise population; employment status of the population; agricultural productivity; size of land holding; depth of water table; sources of irrigation, literacy, main crop; occupation of the population; village small and cottage industries; banking facilities; etc.
Chapter II: Resource envelope: District, blocks and panchayats
The second chapter will deal at length, the data on various sources of income of the district, block and panchayats collected with the help of questionnaire. The sources of income from different centrally and state sponsored schemes are SGSY (Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana); BRGF (Backward Region Grant Fund); MPLAD (Member of Parliament Local Area Development Fund); MLALAD (Member of Legislative Assembly Local Area Development Fund); etc. The own sources of revenue of the district panchayat; block panchayats and village panchayats have to be included in the calculation of the resource envelope.
Chapter III: Panchayat-wise details of infrastructure, resources and employment
The third chapter will discuss the panchayat-wise details of the list of infrastructure already existing and the list of infrastructure required. Secondly, it will also include the total finance available to a panchayat in the current year and the expected finance to be available in the next five years. Thirdly, the chapter will discuss the number of employment and man days to be generated in the next five years in the panchayat.
Chapter IV: Block-wise details of infrastructure, resources and employment
The fourth chapter will discuss the block-wise details of the list of infrastructure already existing and the list of infrastructure required. Secondly, it will also include the total finance available to the block in the current year and the expected finance to be available in the next five years. Thirdly, the chapter will discuss the number of employment and man days to be generated in the next five years in the block.
Chapter V: District-wise details of infrastructure, resources and employment
The fifth chapter will discuss the district-wise details of the list of infrastructure already existing and the list of infrastructure required. Secondly, it will also include the total finance available to the district in the current year and the expected finance to be available in the next five years. Thirdly, the chapter will discuss the number of employment and man days to be generated in the next five years in the district.
Chapter VI: Effectiveness of MGNREGS
This chapter will discuss the effectiveness of MGNREGS in creating employment, promoting wage earning, checking rural-urban migration, promoting irrigation, raising productivity etc.
The analysis of rural poverty and employment trends in India highlights the stark challenges faced by agricultural laborers, particularly in securing sufficient employment to rise above the poverty line. Despite efforts by the government to address these issues, including the introduction of schemes like MGNREGA, rural households continue to experience income deficits, food insecurity, and significant levels of indebtedness. The implementation of MGNREGA has made some progress in offering guaranteed employment and improving rural infrastructure, but structural issues remain.
The scheme's success in providing livelihood security is evident in the employment generation and infrastructure development it has facilitated. However, to fully realize its potential, continued focus is required on ensuring timely employment, equal wage distribution, and effective decentralization of planning. MGNREGA's ability to transform rural lives will depend on the efficient execution of the program at the local level and ongoing government commitment to addressing the underlying causes of rural poverty, such as access to credit, land ownership, and wage disparity. Effective social audits and decentralized planning mechanisms can play pivotal roles in sustaining the scheme’s impact and achieving the broader goal of poverty eradication in rural India.