GET THE APP

International Research Journals
Reach Us +443308187254

Research Article - Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology ( 2023) Volume 12, Issue 4

Detection and Screening of Some Persistent Organic Pollutant in Dogon Ruwa Community of Kaltungo Local Government area of Gombe State, Nigeria

Tugga Halima Mohammed* and Yakubu SO
 
Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Kaltungo, 009 Kaltungo, Gombe State, Nigeria
 
*Corresponding Author:
Tugga Halima Mohammed, Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Federal Polytechnic Kaltungo, 009 Kaltungo, Gombe State, Nigeria, Email: halimamohammedtugga@gmail.com

Received: 03-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. JREST-23-104988; Editor assigned: 05-Jul-2023, Pre QC No. JREST-23-104988; Reviewed: 19-Jul-2023, QC No. JREST-23-104988; Revised: 24-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. JREST-23-104988; Published: 31-Jul-2023, DOI: 10.14303/2315-5698.2023.35

Abstract

Persistent Organic Pollutants” (POPs) are chemical contaminants identified by scientist at World War (II). These contaminants found their way into the environment as result of human activities such as agriculture, industrialization and transportation. They are persistent and can travel long range in the atmosphere to regions where they have never been used or produced, posing serious health effects on humans, wildlife and aquatic environments. This research has identified some of these pollutants in soil and water samples obtained from four different locations from a community within Kaltungo known as Dogon Ruwa. The samples were analyzed for the presence of these pesticides pollutants. QuECHERS method was adopted for the extraction and cleans up, and Gas Chromatography coupled with mass selective detector known as Mass Spectrometer was used for detection. Pesticides of interest are Organochlorine (OC) and Organophosphate (OP). Thirteen Organochlorines pesticides (OCP) with their mean concentration in PPM were determined and the value for water given as; Aldrin 63.9ppm, Endrin 27.3025ppm, Endosulfan I 14.31ppm, Endosulfan II, 2.1ppm, Methoxychlor 9.5325ppm, Heptachlor 25.605ppm, Heptachlor epoxide 273.965ppm, Delta-lindane 13.7725ppm, Alpha lindane1446.8625ppm, Gmma-lindane 12.265ppm, P,P-DDE 22.475ppm, P,P-DDD13.2045ppm and P,P-DDT 5.4775ppm. The mean concentrations for soil are; Aldrin 40.1675ppm, EndosulfanI 188.384ppm, Endosulfan II 2.1125ppm, Methoxychlor 1.0125ppm, (Heptachlor 6.795ppm, Heptachlor epoxide 0.14ppm, Delta lindane1.614ppm, Alpha-lindane8.315ppm, Gmmalindane 12.125ppm, P,P-DDE 3.4525ppm, P,P-DDD 0.485ppm, P,P-DDT 0.485ppm and Endrin 0.645ppm. Five Organophosphates (OP) with their mean concentrations for Water sample includes, Ethoprophos 0.8075ppm, Disulfan 0.02ppm, Ronnel 3.485ppm, Chlorpyrofos 2030.55ppm and Phosphorodithioic acid 1.8425ppm, and for Soil sample; Ethoprophos 0.2675ppm, Disulfoton 0.0075ppm, Ronnel 3.6575ppm, Chloropyrofos 3,154.9475ppm and Phosphorodithioic 0.7825ppm were detected from each of the samples analyzed

Keywords

POPs, Pollutants, Organ chlorines, Organophosphates, Bioaccumulation

INTRODUCTION

Progress in agriculture, industrialization, Transport and Technology are usually important components of economy development of a nation, however these man activities has adversely affects all living organisms in the biosphere resulting in many environmental issue including contamination of the environment by substances that are lethal to all living organism plants and animals inclusive,and one of these environmental contaminants is pesticides Pollutants known as “Persistent Organic Pollutants” (POPs) (Eneh and Agbazue, 2011). POPs are organic compounds which when release into the environment resist degradation by biological, chemical and photolytic processes (Moslen et al., 2019). They are pesticides and literature shows there are over five hundred (500) compounds known as pesticides and its metabolites worldwide (Moslen et al., 2019). POPs are also characterized by low water solubility, low vapor pressure, and low rates of degradation, leading them to bio accumulate and exert toxicity to organisms and humans (Eisenreich et al., 2021). which were originally produced to enhance food production and feed a hungry world by increasing crop yield but their impact on health require a prompt and accurate analysis (Sassola et al., 2012).

Pesticides are mixtures of chemicals, or of biological origin intended for repelling, controlling or destroying pest while regulating the growth of plants (status and trend of pesticides use), pesticides pollutants are mostly man-made chemicals produced for agricultural and industrial uses and these chemicals end up contaminating all region of the world (Elizabeth and Dougherty, 2012). Pesticides used for agricultural purposes are of three major classes; insecticides, fungicides and herbicides with other minor ones including rodenticides, nematicides, garden chemicals, household disinfectants molluscicides and acaricides. and generally they show a wide spectrum of the beneficial effects by improving plants health, maintaining agro-ecosystem and food supply (Tedese et al., 2016).but due to the constant application of these Pesticides, their pollutants has become one of the main drivers of the negative impact of modern industrial agriculture on the environment resulting in environmental issues (Georges, 2004). However, contamination of the environment and food by pesticides has become a topical issue of considerations in many parts of the world, as a result many researchers are investigating the occurrence, distribution and concentrations of these pesticides pollutants in commercially sold farm produce, animal products, soil, water and sediments (Benson and Olufunke., 2011). According to() only 15%of pesticides applied directly get to tis target species and the remaining 85% is distributed in soil and water which is why some researcher on POPs in the environment are focusing on determining their uncertainties due to their ambient sources, atmospheric transport and fate which controls their concentration ( Ojo Joshua, 2006). (Milukaite et al., 2008) In addition to their the negative effects through applications of runoff and pesticide drift can carry pesticides into distant aquatic environments or other fields including human settlements (Tsion et al., 2019). Other source of pesticides pollution is non-point source by fertilizers, pathogen and pesticides (Len Ritter et al., 2002) also as result of the increasing case of pesticides pollution and the need to boost crop production. The needs to identify and screen these pesticides arise to cope their lethal effects on non-target species (Sassolas et al., 2012) because even at low concentration, exposure to these pollutants can harm humans and other organisms (Weinberg, 2008). As such there is need to screen these pesticide pollutants to test the chemical´s potential of being a pollutants and to ascertain that they are threat to human health and can cause environmental and ecological damages (Brown et al., 2008).

This study will be limited to identifying Organ chlorines and Organophosphate’s. Organ chlorines are group of chlorinated compounds widely used in chemical industries and for agriculture as pesticides they are affordable readily available making their usage very high, statistics show that 40% pesticides used are Organochlorine pesticides (Ravindra et al., 2017). Some examples of organochlorine pesticides include; DDT, Chlordane, Dicofol, BHC/HCH, Aldrin, Endosulfan, Heptachlor, Chlordane, Methoxychlor (Rodriguez et al, 2018). Organophosphates are esters of phosphoric acids and these forms of esters. Examples include; Parathion, Malathion, Monocrotophos, Chloropyrifos, Quinalphos, Phorate, Triazophos, Temepos, Diazinon, Fenitrothion, Acephate, Dimethoate, Fenthion, Isofenfos, Phosphamidon (Hassan and El-Nemr, 2020).

However due to increasing use of these pesticides by farmers and lack of knowledge on its usage and maintenance (Sharma et al, 2019) the need to know their environmental effect is paramount as such this research aim is to screen and identify these pesticides to confirm their presence within the community and provide information on the fate of the POPs in the environment and the information obtained from this research will be made available in templates to the community to help farmers know the toxic and non-degradable nature of the pesticides they use in their farms and might help minimize or avoid its usage by going for safer alternatives like organic fertilizer (including organic waste, animal and green manure, biological pest control) and also minimizing the risk of human exposure which The Stockholm Convention and other POPs regulatory bodies are working so hard to protect human health and the environment from POPs (Zhanyun et al., 2022).

The application of GCMS aid in identification of these pesticides. The GCMS is a material analysis method that employs gas chromatography fitted with mass selection detector called mass spectrometer.

The pesticide pollutants identified were found to have same characteristics of POPs stated in the Stockholm Convection which includes their long range transport, bioaccumulation factor, persistent, and their adverse effect on humans (Fiedler et al., 2019).

METHODOLOGY

The study area is a small village known as Dogon Ruwa located under Awak township of Kaltungo local government area of Gombe state. This village is situated at latitude 9° 52´ 0° North and Longitude 11° 24´ 0° east and has a tropical savanna wet climate. The distance from kaltungo to Dogon Ruwa village is 2.7 km (1.6 miles) (Mindat.Org). The Dogon Ruwa people are known for their agricultural activities and they principally grow crops such as millets, groundnuts, fruits as well as vegetables. Other small trade activities also take place in this locality such as welding, and car repair and maintenance.

SAMPLING

The sample collections were done using compass bearing (East South, North West, North East and South) and a total of four different samples each of soil and water were obtained for this purpose. The soil sample collection was done in three categories; first the top soil, followed by soil from 15 meters depth and then 30 meters depth respectively from each location. The soil samples were homogenized in the laboratory and weighed 15g before extraction. Water samples were collected from their irrigation water source in a water can, appropriately labeled for each location. The samples were transported to the laboratory for analysis.

MATERIALS AND REAGENTS

All materials and reagents were of standard analytical grade and these includes: dichloromethane (DCM), Acetonitrile, anhydrous sodium sulfate, sodium acetate, sodium chloride, vortex mixer, magnesium sulfate, a weighing balance, fume chamber, centrifuge machine, micro syringe, the obtained soil and water samples.

Extraction method

The method adopted for the extraction of pesticides was the QuEChERS method. QuEChERS is an acronym for quick, easy, cheap, effective rugged and safe. This method was first used in 2003 where it was used for the analysis of pesticides residue in fruits and vegetables and its procedures involve an initial extraction of target analyte using acetonitrile for soil sample and dichloromethane for water sample, just as in the extraction procedures below (Tedesse et al., 2016).

QuEChERS method for water extraction

During water extraction 10mL of water sample was placed in a 15mL centrifuge tube and 2.5mL dichloromethane was added and the tube was capped and vortex for 3mins before adding 4g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4). 1.5g Sodium acetate and 1g NaOAC was added. The tubes were vortex vigorously for 1min and centrifuged for 10mins at 7000RPM. One milliliter of the supernatant was transferred into a 2mL vial containing 500mg MgSO4. The vials were shaken and subsequently centrifuged. The extract was transferred into a PTFE capped vial (obtained from Agilent GC-MS) for further analysis using GC-MS.

QuEChERS method for soil extraction

During sample extraction of soil, 5g of soil sample was placed in centrifuge tube and 10mL acetonitrile were added and the mixture shaken vigorously. Further, 1.5g Sodium acetate anhydrous (NaOAC) was added to the tube, 4g anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and 1g sodium chloride (NaCl) were added and the mixture were shaken vigorously using a vortex mixer and then centrifuged for 10mins at 7000RPM. Afterwards, 7.5mL aliquot of the supernatant was transferred to a centrifuge tube (15ml) containing 0.75g anhydrous magnesium sulfate, 0.5g C18 and 0.125g PSA. The tube was vortex and centrifuged the aliquot of the supernatant was transferred into a glass test tube and allowed to evaporated to nearly dryness under a stream of nitrogen and the residue was re-dissolved in 1.5mL dichloromethane before its injection into the GC-MS.

Note: Sample extraction in this case was done three times to obtained the required amount of sample for the extraction and making the sample to be 15g in total and the aliquot were added together before analysis. This method was adopted from QuECHERS procedure for pesticides for multi-residue pesticides analysis.

Statistical data analysis

The data obtained during this research work will be presented as mean and relative standard deviation in tables of results adopted from (Hussein et al, 2022).

RESULTS

The tables below show the identified organochlorine and Organophosphate pesticides, with their mean concentration and standard deviation from soil and water samples obtained from the study area (Tables 1-4).

Table 1. Shows the mean concentration and standard deviation levels of HCHs and Aldrins determined in soil samples of the four locations (East, West, North and South).

    a-HCH ?HCH ?-HCH Aldrin Endrin
Soil  Samples MEAN 8.315 1.615 12.125 40.1675 0.645
SD 6.943 2.846 73.73 6.768 5.095
Water Samples MEAN 65.07 13.7725 12.265 63.96 27.3025
SD 1595 13.011 11.355 71,427 0.95

Table 2. Shows the mean concentration and standard deviation levels of Heptachlor and DDTs determined in soil samples of the four locations (East, West, North and South).

    Heptachlor Heptachlorexpoxide P,P-DDT P,P-DDE  P,P-DDD 
Soil Samples   MEAN 25.602 273.965 5.4775 22.475 13.2025
SD 6.768 0.082 0.711 5.095 0.242
Water  Samples   MEAN 6.795 0.14 0.485 3.4525 0.2575
SD 19.439 258.082 9.013 30.917 24

Table 3. Shows the mean concentration and standard deviation levels of Endosulfans and Methoxychlor determined in soil samples of the four locations (East, West, North and South).

    Endosulfan 1 Endosulfan 11  Methoxychlor
Soil  Samples MEAN 188.384 2.1125 1.0125
SD 140.124 0.846 1.136
Water Samples MEAN 14.31 2.1 9.5325
SD 23.887 0.95 7.39

Table 4. Shows the mean concentration and standard deviation levels Organophosphate (Ethopropos, Disulfan, Ronnel, Chloropyrofos and phophorodithioic acid, determined in soil samples of the four locations (East, West,North and South).

    Ethopropos  Disulfoton  Ronnel Chloropyrofos Phosphorodithioic acid
Soil  Samples MEAN 0.1625 0.005 3.1 759 0.356
SD 0.085 0.55 5.409 389.08 0.17
Water Samples   MEAN 0.9125 0.0225 4.0425 2141.415 2.46
SD 0.969 0.244 2.82 66883.65 4.034

DISCUSSION

The levels of organochlorine and organophosphates pesticide residues in the soil and water samples obtained from the four different locations from Dogon Ruwa within the Awak community in Kaltungo were determined using GC-MS. This result of organophosphate from the analysis shows high concentration of chlorpyrifos from one research location to another determining its highest concentration in water sample. According to (Table 4), which could be linked to this particular organophosphate pesticides been used on several crops including corn, soybean, wheat, and varieties of vegetables and fruits making it one of the most widely used pesticides applied to farm for it multipurpose function on various crops, and even local resident can get exposed to it toxic effect when its drifts in the air and come in contact with their drinking water. Furthermore, the mean concentrations for all samples of OCP determined in water from the four different locations ranging from the highest to the lowest mean concentrations which are; concentration of organophophates in water sample- Chloropyrofos 2,141.415ppm > Ronnel 4.0425ppm > Phosphorodithioic acid 2.46ppm > Ethopropos 0.9125ppm > Disulfoton 0.0225ppm and that of organophosphates in soil ranging from the highest to the lowest: Chloropyrofos 389.9275ppm > Ronnel 3.1ppm ≥ Phosphorodithioic acid 0.17ppm > Ethopropos 0.1625ppm > 0.005ppm as seen in the (Table 4) of results.

From the result, the mean concentration of each Organochlorine pesticides determined are; Dalta-lindane Δ1446.8625ppm > Heptachlor 273.965ppm > Aldrin 63.96ppm > Endrin 27.3025ppm > Heptachlor 25.605ppm > P, P-DDE22.475ppm > Endosulfan 1.14.31ppm > Delta- Lindane 13.7725ppm > P, P-DDD 13.2045ppm > Gammalindane 12.265ppm > Methoxychlor 9.5325ppm > P,P-DDT 5.4775ppm > Endosulfan II, 2.1ppm.

In Soil sample the same OCP were determined but at different mean concentration in ppm as can be seen below from the high mean concentration to the loweset mean concentration; Endosulfan 1, 188.384ppm > Aldrin 40.1675ppm >Gamma-lindane 12.125ppm > Aphalindane8.315ppm >Heptachlor 6.795ppm >P,P-DDE 3.4525ppm > Endosulfan 11, 2.1125ppm > Dalta-lindane 1.615ppm > Methoxychlor 1.0125ppm > Endrin 0.645ppm > PPDDT

CONCLUSION

Conclusively, from the results obtained, 13 organochlorine were identified from all of the samples analyzed and these organochlorine are known to volatized into air, runoff and may also reach into surface and ground water and can accumulate by plants or other organisms in the soil and human exposure can occur through taking farm produce already polluted by these pesticides, drinking water or taking sea food that the pollutants have bio-accumulated in. other possible mean of human exposure includes inhalation, direct ingestion and pesticides drift that can directly affect closed vicinity of the sprayed pesticides area. The detected Organochlorines include three isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane (α-HCH, Δ-HCH and γ-HCH), Aldrin, Endrin, Heptachor, Heptaclor epoxides, Endosulfal 1&11, DDTS (P, P-DDT, P.P-DDD and P, P DDE) and lastly Methoxychlor. which according to literatures the existence of all of these Organochlorine pesticides in the environment was as a results of their continuous usage in agriculture without environment health consideration even though, they have played an important role in increasing crops yield but however their environment and human health effects is a matter of great concern even though according to other literatures, this pesticides have been banned because of their persistent nature and environmental health effects. But however they can still be detected and at a risky concentration just as can be seen in the result.

Furthermore, 5 organophosphates were also detected during the analysis. Human exposure to organophosphate had been through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contacts and the toxicology of organophosphate usually occurs in farmers and agricultural industrial workers and some common symptoms of exposure includes anxiety, confusion, drowsiness seizure, insomnia, memory loss and respiratory depression. The followings are the identified organophosphate Ethopropos, Disulfan, Ronnel Chloropyrofos and Ethathioic acid, with chloropyrofos having the highest mean concentration of 389.9 PPM in water and 2141.4 in soil. And according to literatures, this particular Organophophate is used in almost all crops as such acts as multipurpose pesticdes which was why it is found at this concentration. From the results obtained, this proves that, there is pesticides pollution in Dogon Ruwa community as a result of agricultural activities taking place in the community.

RECOMMENDATIONS

From the result obtained, it is recommend that Governmental and non-governmental organizations tackling the issues of environmental pollution should put more effort especially in communities where agricultural activities is the major occupation of the habitat, to enlighten the farmers and guide them on the right ways to use agroallied chemicals and also guide them on the right choice of the pesticides and proper method of applications and lastly recommendation on priority consideration to capacity building and the regulation of toxic chemicals use should be given utmost consideration especially in African countries

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors appreciate and thank Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) for funding this research through Institutional Based Research (IBR) Scheme.

REFERENCES

  1. Benson NU, Olufunke AI (2011). Assessment of contamination by organochlorine pesticides in Solanum lycopersicum L and Capsicum annuum L: A market survey in Nigeria. Africa Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 5(6):437-442.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Bezuayehu Tedese, Endele Teju, Abera Gure (2016). Modified QuECHERS method for the determination of S-Triazine Herbicides Residue in soil sample by High performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detector.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Brown TN, Wania F (2008).Screening Chemicals for the potentials to be persistent Organic Pollutants. A case study of Artic Contaminants.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Burleson E, Dodson SD (2012) Artic Justice Addressing Persistent Organic Pollutants.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Fiedler H, Kallenborn R, Boer JD, Sydnes LK (2019). The Stockholm Convention: A Tool for the Global Regulation of Persistent Organic Pollutants. Chemistry International. 41(2): 4-11.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. George Teller Miller (2004) Sustaining the earth an integral approach.
  12. Len Ritter, Solomon K, Subley P, Hall K, Keen P, et al (2002). Sources, Pathway and relative risk of contaminants in surface water. J Toxicol Environ Health A.
  13. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  14. Mohammed AH, Ahmad El-Nemr (2020) Pesticides Pollution: Classification, Health impact Extraction and treatment techniques. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 46 (3): 207-220.
  15. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  16. Mohammed AH, Omnya SH, Ahmad ET, Wageh SD, Ahmad SA, et al (2022). Health Risk Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides in Edible Tissues of Sea Food. 9.
  17. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  18. Milukaite A, Klanova J, Holoubek I, Rimselyte I, Kvietkus K (2008). Persistent Organic Pollutants in Luthania: Assessment of Air and Soil Contamination. Luthania Journal of Physics. 48(4): 357-366.
  19. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  20. Miebaka M, Ikem IKE, Minimah I, Ebere N. Variation of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Surface Water, Sediment and Fish from a Tidal Creek in the Niger Delta Nigeria.
  21. Google Scholar

  22. Ojo J (2016) Pesticides use and Health in Nigeria. Journal of Science. 8(4).
  23. Google Scholar

  24. Onyenekenwa CE, Agbazue VC (2011). Protection of Nigerian Environment a critical review. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 4(5):490-497.
  25. QuECHERS procedure for multi-residue pesticides analysis.
  26. Ravindra J, Pankajshan M , Puthur S (2016) Organochlorine Pesticides, Their Toxic Effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment. InterdiscipToxicol. 9(3):90-100.
  27. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  28. Rodriquez- Eugenio N, Mclaughlin M, Pennock D (2018). Soil pollution a hidden reality. Rome, FOA.
  29. Sassola A, Priedto Simon B, Marty Jl (2012) Biosensor for pesticides detection: New Trends. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 3(3): 210-232.
  30. Google Scholar

  31. Steven JE, Keri H, Kevin CJ (2021). A global legacy on POPs. A special issue Environmental Science and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55: 9397−9399.
  32. Google Scholar

  33. Tsion K, Steven W (2019). An overview use and impact of organic and synthetic farm inputs in developed and developing countries. Journ of Food and Agric Nutr Dev. 19(3):14517-14540.
  34. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  35. Weinberg J (2008). An NGO Guide to Persistent Organic Pollutants: A Framework for Action to Protect Human Health and the Environment from POPs. 8.
  36. Google Scholar

  37. Zhanyun W, Sam AK, Miriam LD, Roman G, Tom H (2022) Enhancing Scientific Support for the Stockholm Convection´s Implementation: An Analysis of Policy Needs for Scientific Evidence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56: 2936-2949.
  38. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref