Research Article - Journal of Research in Nursing and Midwifery ( 2025) Volume 14, Issue 1
Received: 09-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. jrnm-24-145056; Editor assigned: 12-Aug-2024, Pre QC No. jrnm-24-145056 (PQ); Reviewed: 26-Aug-2024, QC No. jrnm-24-145056; Revised: 11-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. jrnm-24-145056 (R); Published: 18-Jan-2025, DOI: 10.14303/2315-568X.2025.66
Introduction: With 528,000 new instances of cervical cancer reported in 2012, it is one of the most common cancers in women worldwide and is linked to the human papilloma virus. The most prevalent virus that affects the reproductive system is the human papillomavirus, or HPV. For both men and women, the peak period for infection occurs soon after the onset of sexual activity. Although penetrative intercourse is not necessary for HPV transmission, it is sexually transmitted. Genital contact between skin cells is a well-known mechanism of transfer.
Materials and methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study with an institution base was carried out. The data was gathered through self-administered questioner. After the questionnaire's consistency and completeness were verified, it was imported into the Epi Data version 4.6.0.2 statistical program and exported into SPSS window version 25. To calculate the frequency of dependent and independent variables, descriptive statistics were used. The original logistic model had all explanatory variables whose p-value in bivariate logistic regression analysis was less than 0.25. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, a p-value of less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval is considered significant. Ultimately, the statistical association between knowledge and attitudes regarding human papilloma virus vaccine and both crude and adjusted odds ratios were ascertained.
Result: A total of 350 respondents participated in this study making the response rate of 92%. Based on the study, 204 (58.3%) had good knowledge towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. In multivariable analyses, those student’s fathers who can able to read and write were about 3.45 times more likely to have good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination as compared to those who were unable to read and write (AOR=3.45, 95% CI: (1.26-9.47)). Regarding attitude, 184 (52.6%) had favorable attitude towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. Those students who get health education on human papilloma virus vaccination were about 2.08 times more likely to have good attitude as compared to those who were not get health education (AOR=2.08, 95% CI: (1.06-3.45)).
Conclusion: There is a relatively high level of knowledge and average level of attitude toward human papilloma virus vaccination among the respondents. There are still opportunities for further education, advocacy, and support to improve knowledge and attitude.
Knowledge, Attitude, Human papilloma virus, Vaccine, Gedeo zone
CC: Cervical Cancer; CI: Confidence Interval; ETB: Ethiopian Birr; HEPI: Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative; HPV: Human Papilloma Virus; NGO: Non-governmental Organizations; WHO: World Health Organization
Globally, cervical cancer is one of the most common cancer in the women which is human papilloma virus related disease with an estimated 528,000 new cases reported in 2012 (Okunade KS, 2020). HPV strains 16 and 18 are linked to genital infections in more than 99% of instances of cervical cancer (Mattiuzzi C et al., 2020). The most prevalent virus that affects the reproductive system is the human papillomavirus, or HPV (Castle PE et al., 2021). For both men and women, the peak time for infection happens soon after the onset of sexual activity (Biyazin T et al., 2022). Although penetrative sexual contact is not necessary for HPV transmission, it is sexually transmitted. Genital contact between skin cells is a well-known mechanism of transfer (Barnabas RV et al., 2021).
In low-income countries, the primary cause of cancerrelated illness and mortality happens to be cervical cancer (Geneti HB et al., 2016). Due to an inadequate immune system, women who have HIV/AIDS or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome are especially vulnerable to cervical cancer (Adejuyigbe FF et al., 2015). Human papillomavirus is the primary cause of almost all cervical malignancies. Approximately one in twenty cervical malignancies worldwide are linked to HIV (Lakneh EA et al., 2022).
Providing HPV vaccine for individuals who are eligible provides exceptional value for prevention, and minimizing the burden of cervical cancer (Ukumo EY et al., 2022). HPV vaccines aimed against high-risk HPV (types 16 and 18) have an improved capacity to remove approximately 0% of invasive cervical cancer in women (Songthap A et al., 2012).
HPV infection is the primary cause of cervical cancer, a leading cause of cancer among women in Kenya and many sub-Saharan African nations (Voidazan S et al., 2016). High coverage of HPV vaccination is a World Health Organization priority to eliminate cervical cancer globally, but vaccine availability and logistics restrict widespread implementation of the current two or three dose HPV vaccine schedule (Cocchio S et al., 2020).
The negative thoughts and attitudes and lack of understanding about HPV vaccination can decrease HPV vaccine coverage (Kassa HN et al., 2021). As a result, this study aimed to fill the vacuum by giving information regarding degree of awareness and attitude of human papilloma virus vaccination and its associated factors among high school female students in the study area (Najafi-Sharjabad F et al., 2019).
Study setting and design
School based cross-sectional study design was carried out in selected high schools of female students in Gedeo zone from Aprill, 2023 to June, 2023 (Onowhakpor A et al., 2016). This zone is named for the Gedeo people; whose homelands lie in this zone. Dilla is the administrative center; located 362 km south of Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia and the main road from Addis Ababa to Nairobi Kenya crosses the center of the town) and 100 km from Hawassa the capital city of SNNPR. A zone is a home of 10 (four towns and eight woredas) districts and 148 kebeles (Trucchi C et al., 2020). According to the 2007 Census conducted by the Ethiopian Central Statistical Agency a total population of 847,434 of whom 424,742 are men and 422,692 women of which 239,053 were reproductive age women (15–49) (Rashwan H et al., 2011).
Study populations
All selected female students in selected high schools for academic year of 2022/23 during the study period were the participants in the study (Mihretie GN et al., 2023). Female students who were available at the day of data collection at the selected high schools were included in the study. Female students who were seriously ill not included. Using data from a study conducted in Jimma, Ethiopia, the statistical program Open Epi version 3 computed the sample size based on the following assumptions: α level of significance of 0.05, and taking the prevalence of knowledge 52.7%. After accounting for a 10% non-response rate, the total sample size was 363 (Yohannes E et al., 2023).
Data collection tools and procedures
Structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. It contains socio-demographic variables, information related factors, etc. The questionnaires have been adapted through a review of different literature and similar previous studies The data collection instrument was prepared in English and translated into the Amharic and Gedeofa language by expert who is fluent in both languages and back translated to English by another expert to ensure consistency and accuracy.
Interviewer administered questioner was used for data collection. The data was collected by 12 graduated BSc midwives. Six supervisors who is responsible to continuously monitor the data collection with principal investigator was recruited. Training was given for data collectors and supervisors concerning the research objectives, data collection tools and technique, and interview methods that was applied during data collection.
Data processing and analysis
The pre coded responses was entered into epi data version 3.1 software and then it was exported to SPSS for window version 25 for statistical analysis. The descriptive data was presented using frequency, tables, figures, mean and standard deviation. A binary logistic regression was used to identify the association of the independent variables with the dependent variable. Each variable which have p-value less than 0.25 will be added to the final model to control the confounders. Variables which have a p-value<0.05 with 95% confidence interval in the final model was declared statistically significant by multiple logistic regressions.
Socio-demographic characteristics
A total of 350 respondents participated in this study, making the response rate of 92%. The mean age of the respondents was 17.19 years with a standard deviation of 1.93. Among the overall participants 179 (51.1%) were protestant, and followed by 99 (28.3%) were orthodox. Regarding place of participant’s residence 181 (51.7%) of respondents were living in urban areas (Table 1).
| Variables | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Age | ||
| 14-15 | 22 | 6.3 |
| 16-18 | 260 | 74.3 |
| >18 | 68 | 19.4 |
| Religion | ||
| Orthodox | 99 | 28.3 |
| Muslim | 54 | 15.4 |
| Protestant | 179 | 51.1 |
| Catholic | 18 | 5.1 |
| Mother’s educational level | ||
| Unable to read and write | 81 | 23.1 |
| Able to read and write | 106 | 30.3 |
| Primary (1-8) | 61 | 17.4 |
| Secondary (9-12) | 53 | 15.1 |
| Higher education | 49 | 14 |
| Father’s educational level | ||
| Unable to read and write | 74 | 21.1 |
| Able to read and write | 61 | 17.4 |
| Primary (1-8) | 51 | 14.6 |
| Secondary (9-12) | 36 | 10.3 |
| College and above | 128 | 36.6 |
| Mother’s occupation | ||
| Government employee | 56 | 16 |
| Non-government employee | 28 | 8 |
| Farmer | 101 | 28.9 |
| Merchant | 102 | 29.1 |
| Daily laborer | 26 | 7.4 |
| Housewife | 37 | 10.6 |
| Father’s occupation | ||
| Government employee | 134 | 38.3 |
| Non-government employee | 10 | 2.9 |
| Farmer | 112 | 32 |
| Merchant | 75 | 21.4 |
| Daily laborer | 12 | 3.4 |
| Have no work | 7 | 2 |
| Marital status of student | ||
| Single | 325 | 92.9 |
| Married | 25 | 7.1 |
| Residence | ||
| Rural | 181 | 51.7 |
| Urban | 169 | 48.3 |
Table 1. Socio demographic characteristics of participants for assessment of knowledge and attitude towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo zone, 2023.
Information related factors
Out of the 350 participants in our study, 196 (or 56%) were getting health education regarding the human papilloma virus vaccination (Table 2).
| Variable | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Have you TV or radio | ||
| Yes | 182 | 52 |
| No | 168 | 48 |
| Have you mobile phone | ||
| Yes | 303 | 86.6 |
| No | 47 | 13.4 |
| Do you use social media? | ||
| Yes | 194 | 55.4 |
| No | 156 | 44.6 |
| Do you have information on HPV vaccine? | ||
| Yes | 233 | 66.6 |
| No | 117 | 33.4 |
| Do you get health education on HPV vaccine? | ||
| Yes | 196 | 56 |
| No | 154 | 44 |
| Do you participate in your school mine media club? | ||
| Yes | 180 | 51.4 |
| No | 170 | 48.6 |
Table 2. Information related factors of participants for assessment of knowledge and attitude towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo zone, 2023.
Social life
In this study out of the 350 participants 81.4% of students had good relation with their friends (Table 3).
| Variable | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
| Do you have good relation with your friends? | ||
| Yes | 285 | 81.4 |
| No | 65 | 18.6 |
| Do you have substance addiction? | ||
| Yes | 27 | 7.7 |
| No | 323 | 92.3 |
| Family’s substance addiction status | ||
| Yes | 34 | 9.7 |
| No | 316 | 90.3 |
Table 3. Social life characteristics towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo Zone, 2023.
Knowledge characteristics
Around 68.9% (241) of the participant were heard about the human papilloma virus vaccination. Among the sampled population, considering nine knowledge assessing questions 204 (58.3%) had good knowledge towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students (Table 4).
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
| Did you hear about HPV vaccine? | Yes | 241 | 68.9 |
| No | 109 | 31.1 | |
| Why HPV vaccine given? | Prevent cervical cancer | 286 | 78.8 |
| Other | 77 | 21.2 | |
| Did you know about use of HPV vaccine? | Yes | 193 | 55.1 |
| No | 157 | 44.9 | |
| Who should get HPV vaccine? | Female | 305 | 87.1 |
| Male | 45 | 12.9 | |
| Did you know at what age should HPV vaccine started? | Yes | 165 | 47.1 |
| No | 185 | 52.9 | |
| Did you know how many times HPV vaccine given? | Yes | 170 | 48.6 |
| No | 180 | 51.4 | |
| Did you know HPV vaccine given in Ethiopia? | Yes | 193 | 55.1 |
| No | 157 | 44.9 | |
| Did you know HPV vaccine given freely for female students? | Yes | 205 | 58.6 |
| No | 145 | 41.4 | |
| Did you know HPV vaccine given better for not started sex? | Yes | 221 | 63.1 |
| No | 129 | 36.9 | |
| The composite score of knowledge on HPV vaccine | Good knowledge | 204 | 58.3 |
| Poor knowledge | 146 | 41.7 |
Table 4. Knowledge characteristics towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo Zone, 2023.
Attitude characteristics
Among the sampled population, taking seven attitude assessing questions into consideration, 184 (52.6%) had favorable attitude towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. Majority of students 232 (66.3%) think that HPV vaccine reduce cervical cancer (Table 5).
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
| Do you think the vaccination is given to minimize cervical cancer? | No | 118 | 33.7 |
| Yes | 232 | 66.3 | |
| Do you think vaccination helps to prevent HPV infection? | No | 174 | 49.7 |
| Yes | 176 | 50.3 | |
| Do you think HPV vaccine saves life and improve health? | No | 160 | 45.7 |
| Yes | 190 | 54.3 | |
| Do think you recommend the vaccine to others or not? | No | 185 | 52.9 |
| Yes | 165 | 47.1 | |
| Do you think having the HPV vaccine may become sexually promiscuous? | No | 263 | 75.1 |
| Yes | 87 | 24.9 | |
| Do you think your family should decide whether you take the vaccine or not? | No | 192 | 54.9 |
| Yes | 158 | 45.1 | |
| Do think you take HPV vaccine if it will started given in your school? | No | 123 | 35.1 |
| Yes | 227 | 64.9 | |
| The composite score of attitude on HPV vaccine | Unfavorable | 166 | 47.4 |
| Favorable | 184 | 52.6 |
Table 5. Attitude characteristics towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo Zone, 2023.
Factors associated with knowledge
Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done to see the effect of the selected characteristics on knowledge level towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. Age of student, mothers educational level, fathers educational level, using social media, etc., were found to have an association with knowledge level towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in the bivariate analyses at p-value less than 0.25.
In multivariable analyses, residence of student, father’s education, having information on HPV vaccine, receiving health education on HPV vaccine and student’s substance addiction status were significantly associated with knowledge towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. Those student’s fathers who can able to read and write were about 3.45 times more likely to have good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination as compared to those who were unable to read and write (AOR=3.45, 95% CI: (1.26-9.47)) (Table 6).
| Variable | Frequency | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
| Good kge | Poor kge | |||
| Age (in years) | ||||
| 14-15 | 13 | 9 | 1st | 1st |
| 16-18 | 168 | 92 | 0.79 (0.33-1.92) | 0.61 (0.18-2.03) |
| >18 | 23 | 45 | 2.83 (1.05-7.59) | 0.39 (0.1-1.57) |
| Place residence | ||||
| Urban | 170 | 76 | 1st | 1st |
| Rural | 34 | 70 | 4.61 (2.82-7.52)* | 3.59 (1.67-7.74)** |
| Grade level | ||||
| 9th | 98 | 51 | 1st | 1st |
| 10th | 106 | 95 | 1.72 (1.11-2.67) | 1.56 (0.81-3.01) |
| Mother’s educational level | ||||
| Unable to read and write | 38 | 43 | 1st | 1st |
| Able to read and write | 50 | 56 | 1 (0.55-1.77) | 1.14 (0.51-2.58) |
| Primary school (1-8) | 34 | 27 | 0.7 (0.36-1.37) | 1.85 (0.71-4.85) |
| Secondary school (9-12) | 42 | 11 | 0.23 (0.11-0.51) | 0.52 (0.18,-.47) |
| College and above | 40 | 9 | 0.2 (0.09-0.46) | 0.49 (0.16-1.51) |
| Father’s educational level | ||||
| Unable to read and write | 35 | 39 | 1st | 1st |
| Able to read and write | 29 | 32 | 0.99 (0.5-1.95)* | 3.45 (1.26-9.47)** |
| Primary school (1-8) | 21 | 30 | 1.28 (0.62-2.64) | 1.6 (0.61-4.25) |
| Secondary school (9-12) | 20 | 16 | 0.72 (0.32-1.6) | 2.5 (0.79-7.93) |
| College and above | 99 | 29 | 0.26 (0.14-0.49) ) | 0.92 (0.35-2.44) |
| Students boyfriend status | ||||
| Yes | 122 | 71 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 82 | 75 | 1.57 (1.02-2.4) | 1 (0.54-1.87) |
| Do you have TV or radio? | ||||
| Yes | 117 | 65 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 87 | 81 | 1.68 (1.09-2.57) | 0.97 (0.54-1.75) |
| Do you have mobile phone? | ||||
| Yes | 184 | 119 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 20 | 27 | 2.09 (1.12-3.89) | 0.96 (0.39-2.36) |
| Have you used social media? | ||||
| Yes | 124 | 70 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 80 | 76 | 1.68 (1.1-2.59) | 1.38 (0.74-2.58) |
| Have you participate in school mine media club? | ||||
| Yes | 112 | 68 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 92 | 78 | 1.4 (0.9-2.14) | 1.11 (0.61-2.02) |
| Have you information on HPV vaccine? | ||||
| Yes | 165 | 68 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 39 | 78 | 4.85 (3.02-7.54)*** | 3.78 (2.08-6.85)*** |
| Do you have good relation with friends? | ||||
| Yes | 179 | 106 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 25 | 40 | 2.7 (1.55-4.7) | 1.75 (0.84-3.65) |
| Did you receive health education on HPV vaccine? | ||||
| Yes | 144 | 50 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 58 | 96 | 4.77 (3.02-7.54)* | 4.43 (2.4-8.2) )*** |
| Substance addiction status | ||||
| Yes | 10 | 17 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 194 | 129 | 0.39 (0.17-0.88)* | 1.32 (1.45-12.5)** |
| Note: 1st=Reference category, *=PV<0.25, **=PV<0.05, ***=PV<0.0001, COR: Cruds Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval | ||||
Table 6. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of knowledge towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo Zone, 2023.
Factors associated with attitude
Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done to see the relationship of selected characteristics on attitude level towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. Age in years, students grade level, place of residence, mother’s occupation, receiving health education on HPV vaccine, etc., were found to have an association with attitude towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in the bivariate analyses at p-value less than 0.25.
In the multivariable analyses, mother’s occupation, boyfriend status of student, receiving health education on HPV vaccine and student’s relation with friends were significantly associated with attitude toward human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. The study revealed that those students who get health education on human papilloma virus vaccination were about 2.08 times more likely to have good attitude as compared to those who were not get health education (AOR=2.08, 95% CI: (1.06-3.45)) (Table 7).
| Variable | Frequency | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
| Unfavorable attitude | Favorable attitude | |||
| Age (in years) | ||||
| 14-15 | 9 | 13 | 1st | 1st |
| 16-18 | 114 | 146 | 0.89 (0.37-2.15) | 0.81 (0.27-2.41) |
| >18 | 43 | 25 | 0.4 (0.15-1.08) | 0.94 (0.26-3.41) |
| Students grade level | ||||
| 9th | 64 | 85 | 1st | 1st |
| 10th | 102 | 99 | 0.73 (0.48-1.12) | 1 (0.56-1.76) |
| School type | ||||
| Private | 24 | 41 | 1st | 1st |
| Government | 142 | 143 | 0.59 (0.34-1.03) | 0.89 (0.42-1.88) |
| Place of residence | ||||
| Urban | 110 | 136 | 1st | 1st |
| Rural | 56 | 48 | 0.69 (0.44-1.1) | 1.16 (0.58-2.33) |
| Mother’s educational level | ||||
| Unable to read and write | 42 | 39 | 1st | 1st |
| Able to read and write | 60 | 46 | 0.83 (0.46-1.48) | 0.78 (0.37-1.65) |
| Primary school (1-8) | 27 | 34 | 1.36 (0.7-2.64) | 0.83 (0.34-2.04) |
| Secondary school (9-12) | 13 | 40 | 3.31 (1.55-7.1) | 1.91 (0.71-5.1) |
| College and above | 24 | 25 | 1.12 (0.55-2.78) | 0.35 (0.1-1.24) |
| Mother’s occupation | ||||
| Government employee | 20 | 36 | 1st | 1st |
| Nongovernment employee | 16 | 12 | 0.42 (0.17-1.05)* | 1.18 (1.54-25)** |
| Farmer | 61 | 40 | 0.36 (0.19-0.72)* | 1.3 (1.12-14.29)** |
| Merchant | 46 | 56 | 0.68 (0.35-1.32) | 0.46 (0.13-1.59) |
| Daily laborer | 8 | 18 | 1.25 (0.46-3.39) | 0.47 (0.11-2.0) |
| Housewife | 15 | 22 | 0.82 (0.35-1.91) | 0.38 (0.1-1.48) |
| Father’s educational level | ||||
| Unable to read and write | 40 | 34 | 1st | 1st |
| Able to read and write | 39 | 22 | 0.66 (0.33-1.33) | 0.7 (0.28-1.74) |
| Primary school (1-8) | 28 | 23 | 0.97 (0.47-1.98) | 1.11 (0.45-2.71) |
| Secondary school (9-12) | 10 | 26 | 3.06 (1.29-7.23) | 2.49 (0.78-7.94) |
| College and above | 49 | 79 | 1.9 (1.06-3.39) | 1.41 (0.61-3.27) |
| From whom you live now? | ||||
| Single | 34 | 23 | 1st | 1st |
| Family | 126 | 152 | 1.78 (1.0-3.18) | 0.95 (0.46-1.95) |
| Friends | 6 | 9 | 2.22 (0.70-7.08) | 2.25 (0.57-8.86) |
| Did you receive health education about HPV? | ||||
| Yes | 80 | 85 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 114 | 69 | 0.57 (0.37-0.87)* | 2.08 (1.06-3.45)** |
| Students boyfriend status | ||||
| Yes | 103 | 90 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 63 | 94 | 1.71 (1.12-2.62)* | 2.55 (1.43-4.56)** |
| Do you have mobile phone? | ||||
| Yes | 137 | 166 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 29 | 18 | 0.51 (0.27-0.96) | 0.7 (0.31-1.6) |
| Do you use social media? | ||||
| Yes | 78 | 116 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 88 | 68 | 0.52 (0.34-0.80) | 0.67 (0.38-1.17) |
| Do you participate in school mini media club? | ||||
| Yes | 79 | 101 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 87 | 83 | 0.75 (0.49-1.14) | 0.88 (0.51-1.51) |
| Do you have good relation with friends? | ||||
| Yes | 123 | 162 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 43 | 22 | 0.39 (0.22-0.68)* | 1.79 (1.12-4.55)** |
| Substance addiction of student | ||||
| Yes | 17 | 10 | 1st | 1st |
| No | 149 | 174 | 1.99(0.88-4.47) | 1.67(0.61-4.54) |
| Note: 1st=Reference category, *=PV<0.25, **=PV<0.05, ***=PV<0.0001, COR: Cruds Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval | ||||
Table 7. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of attitude towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students in Gedeo zone, 2023.
A cross-sectional study based on institutions was carried out to assess the knowledge and attitudes of female high school students in Gedeo zone about human papilloma virus vaccination and related issues. The study found a significant association between place of residence of student, father’s education, having information on HPV vaccine, receiving health education on HPV vaccine and student’s substance addiction status were significantly with knowledge towards human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students. Additionally, mother’s occupation, boyfriend status of student, receiving health education on HPV vaccine and student’s relation with friends were significantly associated with attitude toward human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students.
This study found that 58.3% of study participants had good knowledge of human papilloma virus vaccination among female high school students (95% CI: (36-48)). These result is in line with study conducted in Southwest Ethiopia (43.8%). This result is higher than study conducted in Ambo, Ethiopia (24.6%), Nigeria (21.1%). However, the finding is lower than study conducted in Bahirdar (58.1%), Jimma (52.7%) and Arbaminch (71.7%), Thailand (60%), Romania (85.8%), Italy (69.9%). The possible variation might be due to change in the study setting, study population, and time frame of the study, the availability and distribution of the HPV vaccine in various countries.
From the current study 52.6% of female participants had a positive attitude regarding human papilloma virus vaccination (95% CI: (47-59)). This results are in line with study conducted Ambo town (55.6%) and Minjar shenkora, Ethiopia (50.8%). This result is higher than study conducted in Bahirdar (16%), Southwest Ethiopia (44.4%), Jimma (31.4%), Iran (43%). But, the finding is lower than study conducted in Nigeria (61.8%), Italy (20%). This may be due to differences in socio-demographic factors, educational level, and limited coverage of targeted educational initiatives, low access to information among low-income countries.
The current study indicated that students who live in urban area 3.59 times more likely having good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination than who live in rural area (AOR: 3.59, 95% CI: (1.67-7.74)). This is due to students born in towns have relatively easy access to information via social and mass media. Participant’s fathers who able to read and write were 3.45 times more likely having good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination than unable to read and write (AOR: 3.45, 95% CI: (1.29-9.47)). This result is strengthening by study conducted in Malaysia. The possible reason for this is that the probability of those parents knowing about the HPV vaccine through the media, newspapers, and social media.
Having information about human papilloma virus vaccination is 3.78 times more likely to have good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination than who have not information (AOR: 3.78, 95% CI: (2.08-6.85)). This result is in line with study conducted in Debretabor, Ethiopia. This is explained by the fact that students might currently have better access to health extension personnel's information. Students were more likely to possess solid knowledge of the HPV vaccine if they could access sources of information about it. Getting health education about human papilloma virus vaccination is 4.43 times more likely to have good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination than who have not (AOR: 4.43, 95% CI: (2.4- 8.2)). Participants who are not substance addicted is 1.32 times more likely to have good knowledge about human papilloma virus vaccination than who have not (AOR: 1.32, 95% CI: (1.45-12.5)).
The current study shows that student’s mothers who were government employee is 1.18 and 1.3 times more likely to have favorable attitude about human papilloma virus vaccination than nongovernment employee (AOR: 1.18, 95% CI: (1.54-25)) and farmers (AOR: 1.3, 95% CI: (1.12- 14.29)) respectively.
Participants who have getting health education about human papilloma virus vaccination were two times more likely having favorable attitude than not getting health education (AOR: 2.08, 95% CI: (1.06-3.45)). This result is in line with study conducted in Ambo Ethiopia.
Participants who have boyfriend were 2.55 times more likely to have favorable attitude about human papilloma virus vaccination than who have not (AOR: 2.55, 95% CI: (1.43-4.56)). They may discuss the probability of getting HPV and vaccines.
Participants who have good relation with their friends were 1.79 times more likely to have favorable attitude about human papilloma virus vaccination than who have not (AOR: 1.79, 95% CI: (1.12-4.55). Participants may discus in different reproductive issues.
Limitation of the study
The main limitation of this study is that male students weren't included in the study as participants. The second drawback is that some students may be biased since they were older than the target population when it came to receiving the human papilloma virus vaccination.
To assess the knowledge and attitude of female high school students in Gedeo zone about human papilloma virus vaccination and related issues, a cross-sectional survey was conducted. The percentage of female high school students who have good knowledge and positive attitudes about human papilloma virus vaccination was 58.3 and 52.6 percent, respectively. There is a relatively high level of knowledge and average level of attitude toward human papilloma virus vaccination among the respondents. There are still opportunities for further education, advocacy, and support to improve knowledge and attitude.
Ethical clearance was obtained from Dilla university college of medicine and health science Institutional Review Board (IRB). A formal letter of permission and support was provided to Gedeo zone educational office. Explanation about the aims, objectives, benefits and risks of the study was provided. Informed, voluntary, written and signed consent was obtained from each respondent. Participants were communicated about their confidentiality and right to refuse or to answer the questionnaire and stop or withdraw at any time of data collection. Confidentiality will be maintained at all levels of the study through the anonymous data collection.
Firstly, we would like to acknowledge Health Professionals Education Partnership Initiative Program (HEPI) for giving us this opportunity.
Secondly, for Dilla University for settling this opportunity and to department of midwifery staffs for their suggestions and comments during the development of this work.
Lastly, we would like also to thank our friends and colleagues who directly or indirectly contributed their irreplaceable support during the preparation of this research.
Mebirat Ademassu and Melkam Andargie were involved in designed the research, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the result and drafted the paper, and participated in preparing all versions of the manuscript. Wagaye Alemu have assisted in the design, and the proposal development, monitored data collection, assisted during analysis, and revised subsequent drafts of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Regarding this paper, the authors disclose no conflicts of interest.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]