Research Article - International Research Journal of Biotechnology ( 2025) Volume 16, Issue 1
Received: 05-Oct-2023, Manuscript No. irjob-24-123821; Editor assigned: 09-Oct-2023, Pre QC No. irjob-24-123821 (PQ); Reviewed: 23-Oct-2023, QC No. irjob-24-123821; Revised: 01-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. irjob-24-123821 (R); Published: 10-Jan-2024, DOI: 10.14303/2141-5153.2024.105
In this study, the adsorption of Rhodamine B (RhB) on activated carbon obtained by processing coconut leaves was investigated. The effects of initial RhB concentration, temperature, and pH on the dye adsorption process were investigated. Initial RhB concentration and temperature were found to be important but pH did not affect RhB adsorption. Adsorption kinetic balance was examined. The adsorption kinetics of RhB were simulated using the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The Langmuir isotherm model is effective in describing adsorption equilibrium data.
Activated carbon, Adsorption, Rhodamine Rhodamine-B
Water pollution is an environmental problem that affects everyone. Leakage of heavy metals into water is a serious problem that can cause water pollution. The inability to decompose and toxicity of metals, together with their concentration in water, cause serious diseases. It is well known that many metals such as Copper (Cu), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Mercury (Hg) are very toxic (Salleh MA, et al. 2011). Open burning of coconuts often results in the release of toxic chemicals. It makes the weather very bad. The use of regional agricultural products as adsorbents has attracted attention recently (Crini G, 2006; Gupta VK, et al. 2009). Agricultural wastes were converted into activated carbon for adsorption capacity of biomaterials. A chemical reaction is used to produce activated carbon at the laboratory level. At 400°C the stage 1 process was initiated (Demirbas A, 2009). It seems better to use the one-step method because a lower level of activation is needed, which reduces production costs and saves energy over time. This process produces activated carbon with high adsorption capacity (Amin NK, 2009). With the use of clean technology, waste can be recycled and the amount of waste thrown into landfills can be reduced. To enhance the detoxification effect, the second waste needs to be processed. The adsorption process is one of the most effective methods for recycling secondary waste.
Experimental
Production of activated carbon: Place about 300 grams of coconut leaves in a 2.0 liter container. Orthophosphoric acid (H3PO4:biomass::3:1 w/w) was added slowly until the edge of the precursor was completely immersed in the acid. Soak the mixture in acid for 24 hours, stirring occasionally with a glass rod to increase the acid content of the biomass. Transfer the dry material from the beaker to a 30 cm x 9 cm x 9 cm Stainless Steel (SS) container. Place the SS container containing the acid-laden biomass into the muffle furnace with the lid half-open. A small amount of nitrogen is introduced into the furnace to maintain an oxygen-free environment. The oven was slowly heated to 400°C for 30 minutes and maintained at this temperature for 90 minutes. Heating was stopped immediately and the product was allowed to cool under a stream of nitrogen. The cooled sample was removed from the furnace the next day and acid-loaded activated carbon was obtained. The material was washed several times with distilled water to remove all phosphoric acid and then dried in an oven at 110°C for 6 hours. The dried sample is crushed and sieved to obtain coconut leaf activated carbon. Finished products pass through 710, 500, 355 and 53 (pan) sieves, and the product qualities are CL-PA-710, CL-PA-500, CL-PA-355 and CL-PA-53 (pan) (Figure 1).
Methods of analysis: The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and the pore structure analysis were conducted on a micromeritics ASAP 2010 surface analyzer. The pore size distributions were calculated according to the Density Functional Theory (DFT) method. The absorbance of RhB was analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer (UV2400). The value of pH was measured by a pH meter (PHS-25).
Surface area analysis
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller nitrogen adsorption technology is used to calculate the surface area of activated carbon (Preethi S, et al. 2006) Scanning electron microscope data show that H3PO4 is the best activator in terms of physical and chemical properties of activated carbon. According to Table 1, carbon CL-PA-355 has a larger area than carbon CL-PA-710 and carbon CL-PA-500. Model NO: CL-PA-53. In addition, the adsorption capacity of CL also increases due to its type IV isotherm pattern. The increased surface area of CL-PA-355, as shown in Table 1, may be due to the presence of micropores. CL-PA-355 was modified for further studies as it has a larger area.
Sr. No. | Adsorbents | Surface area (m2/g) |
---|---|---|
1 | Coconut leaves (CL-PA-710)-1:1 | 760.54 |
2 | Coconut leaves (CL-PA-500)-2:1 | 1003.9 |
3 | Coconut leaves (CL-PA-355)-3:1 | 1060.57 |
4 | Coconut leaves (CL-PA-53)-4:1 | 875.87 |
Table 1. Adsorbents used, their surface areas (found by Autosorb-1).
SEM Analysis
To obtain the coconut leaves' carbon display morphology, a flexible SEM analysis was conducted; fiber and sheet-like particles may be seen in Figure 2.
Figure 3 shows fiber like sand sheet like structure, which indicates the adsorption capacity of active carbon in turn will help to describe the adsorption kinetics.
Texture properties of activated carbons
Table 1 provides a summary of the properties of various activated carbons. Small volume (0.00148 m3/g) and low BET area (760.54 m2/g) belong to CL-PA-710. Treatment of CL-PA-355 with hot water resulted in an increase in BET surface area and pore volume. CL-PA-355 has a large pore volume and BET surface area. Most have mesopores (Figure 2 and Table 1). For CL-PA-355, the micropore surface area can reach 1060.57 m2/g, which is larger than the mesopore surface area of 1193 m2/g. Briefly, the BET area of the four materials increases in the following order: CL-PA-355, CL-PA-53, CL-PA-500, and CL-PA-710.
Effect of different activated carbons on adsorption
RhB was adsorbed onto four carbons in the following order: CL-PA-355, CL-PA-53, CL-PA-500, and CL-PA-710 (Figure 4a).This is based on BET surface area change. Considering thevalue of activated carbon, the CL-PA-355 study is the mainfocus of this study. In particular, most of the pores in CL-PA-355 are larger than 2 nm (Figure 4b), making them suitablefor adsorbing RhB. The length and width of RhB moleculesare 1.8 and 0.7 nm, respectively (Gad HM, et al. 2009; Guo Y, etal. 2005).
Effect of contact time and initial RhB concentration
As contact time increased, CL-PA-355 absorbed more RhB. The change in absorbance was very small when the exposure time was more than 5 h, indicating an equilibrium time of approximately 5 h. The amount of RhB adsorbed by activated carbon at equilibrium serves as a measure of RhB adsorption capacity. At the beginning of adsorption, many active sites (including pores) of activated carbon are empty. Therefore, immediate adsorption occurs in 0-0.5 hours. After this, the adsorption rate slows down (0.5-6 hours) as the number of available adsorption sites decreases, forcing the RhB molecules to pass through deep holes in the activated carbon (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Effect of contact time on adsorption of RhB on different activated carbons (C0: 300 mg L−1; Temperature: 400°C). (a): Effect of contact time on RhB adsorption on CL-PA-355 at different initial RhB concentration (Temperature: 293 K); (b): pH (C0: 300 mg L−1; Temperature: 293 K), the inset is the effect of pH on the uptake at equilibration time (5 h).
The adsorption capacity increased from 223.8 to 233.9 mg g−1, and the pH increased from 1.3 to 3.20, as shown in Figure 3b. In the pH range between 3.20 and 10.1, the adsorption capacity does not change much. When the pH value increased from 10.1 to 13.5, the adsorption capacity decreased from 232.5 to 217.8 mg g−1. The mechanism by which initial pH affects RhB adsorption is complex. According to Lagura, et al. the electrostatic interaction between the negative charge of RhB and the negative charge of the adsorbent causes the adsorption of RhB to increase with increasing pH (Largura MC, et al. 2010). Different results were presented by Jain, et al. who found that RhB adsorption decreased with increasing pH. The explanation for this phenomenon is that low pH causes protonation of the adsorbent, thereby causing RhB diffusion and creating a large number of active sites on the adsorbent surface (Jain R, et al.). Wang and Zhu found that RhB adsorption was less affected by pH; this phenomenon is due to the presence of many functional groups of RhB (Wang S, et al. 2007). Additionally, RhB can exhibit different molecular structures depending on the pH of the solution; below pH=3.5 it is a monomer and a zwitterion. pH=3.5 (Anandkumar J, 2011). In RhB solution, H+ ions and OH can compete with cations and anions, respectively. In addition to the RhB molecular form, pH also affects the surface of activated carbon. Considering the above reasons, it is not surprising that the change in adsorption capacity is not stable. The adsorption capacity changes as pH changes, but only slightly. The zero charge pH point of CL-PA-355 is 6.48 (Figure 5b), which is close to the middle, indicating that the number of acidic and simple functional groups on the CL surface of PA-355 will be approximately equal.
Point zero charge
CL-PA-355 has a zero charge pH point of 6.48, which is closeto the middle (Figure 6). This indicates that the number of basic andacidic functional groups on the PK surface AC will beapproximately equal. RhB was adsorbed to CL-PA-355 only atlow pH values. Even in alkaline or acidic liquids, CL-PA-355shows strong adsorption capacity. This result shows that CL-PA-355 has good performance as an adsorbent. Therefore,iodine and methylene blue numbers were used to confirmthe results. When the balance of positive charges andnegative charges is equal, the pH point of the charge is zeroand is the pH value of the liquid around the adsorbent (GeziciO, et al. 2006). According to published data, the additionmethod was used to obtain the null value of CL-PA-355 (Table 2 and 3).
Mesh size | 710 | 500 | 355 | 53 (Pan) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Burette reading (ml) | 31.7 | 22.9 | 17.6 | 15.2 |
Filtrate normality | 0.0634 | 0.0458 | 0.0352 | 0.0304 |
Factor | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
Iodine number | 315.37 | 529.76 | 716.55 | 710.21 |
Note: Iodine number for CL-PA-355 gives higher value of iodine number. |
Table 2. Iodine number value for different mesh size.
Sample | Wt. of sample (gm.) | Burette reading | Decolorizing power |
---|---|---|---|
CL-PA-53 | 0.1 | 59 | 700.5 |
CL-PA-355 | 0.1 | 47 | 705 |
CL-PA-500 | 0.1 | 39 | 585 |
CL-PA-710 | 0.1 | 23 | 345 |
Table 3. Methylene blue number.
Methylene blue value for CL-PA-355 gives higher value which indicates that coconut based activated carbon is feasible to remove the dye.
Adsorption kinetics
Adsorption kinetics of RhB, including the adsorption mechanism and rate controlling steps, were examined by pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order and intra-particle diffusion model.
Pseudo-first order model: The pseudo-first order model is depicted as (Demirbas E, et al. 2009):
Log(qe−qt)=log qe –k1 t/2.303
Where qe (mg g−1) and qt (mg g−1) are the adsorption capacity of RhB onto CL-PA-355 at equilibrium and at time t, respectively. k1 (min−1) is the pseudo-first order rate constant. The values of k1 and qe, obtained from the slop and the intercept of plots of log(qe−qt) versus t, are displayed in Table 4.
Pseudo-second order model: The pseudo-second order model is expressed as (Al-Othman ZA, et al. 2012):
t/qt=1/k2qe2+t/qe
Where k2 (g mg−1 min−1) denotes the pseudo-second order rate constant. The values of k2 and qe were calculated from the slope and intercept of plots of t/qt versus t. The initial adsorption rate is denoted as h (mg g−1 min−1).
qe,exp (mg g-1 ) |
Pseudo-first order model |
Pseudo-second order model |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
k1 (min-1 ) |
qe (mg g-1 ) |
R2 |
k2 (g mg-1 min-1 ) |
qe (mg g-1 ) |
R2 |
||
C0 (mg L-1 ) |
|
||||||
100 | 100.1 | 0.0056 | 10.8 | 0.945 | 0.00168 | 98.2 | 0.999 |
200 | 181.2 | 0.0112 | 77.6 | 0.810 | 0.00029 | 185.9 | 0.997 |
300 | 241.5 | 0.0085 | 62.0 | 0.871 | 0.00030 | 245.7 | 0.999 |
400 | 288.1 | 0.0064 | 114.6 | 0.978 | 0.00013 | 315.5 | 0.996 |
500 | 350.0 | 0.0071 | 145.4 | 0.901 | 0.00010 | 370.4 | 0.996 |
600 | 413.9 | 0.0187 | 491.2 | 0.672 | 0.00008 | 409.8 | 0.994 |
T (K) | |||||||
573 | 241.5 | 0.0085 | 62.0 | 0.871 | 0.00030 | 245.7 | 0.999 |
623 | 275.2 | 0.0091 | 90.8 | 0.981 | 0.00020 | 286.5 | 0.999 |
673 | 279.3 | 0.0085 | 84.4 | 0.982 | 0.00023 | 295.0 | 0.999 |
723 | 286.1 | 0.0141 | 99.2 | 0.986 | 0.00030 | 295.9 | 0.999 |
pH | |||||||
1.3 | 223.8 | 0.0114 | 95.6 | 0.997 | 0.00023 | 237.0 | 0.999 |
3.2 | 233.9 | 0.0057 | 93.3 | 0.988 | 0.00015 | 257.7 | 0.994 |
6.8 | 234.0 | 0.0063 | 95.0 | 0.979 | 0.00015 | 257.1 | 0.995 |
10.1 | 232.4 | 0.0078 | 86.7 | 0.978 | 0.00020 | 248.8 | 0.998 |
13.5 | 217.7 | 0.0055 | 85.2 | 0.971 | 0.00016 | 243.3 | 0.994 |
Table 4. Kinetic parameters for RhB adsorption onto CL-PA-355 at different initial RhB concentration, temperature and Ph.
Table 4 contains a list of the k2, qe, and h. The correlation coefficients R2 of the pseudo-second order model were greater than the pseudo-first order model, being near to 1 (>0.99). The qe estimated from the pseudo-second order model was substantially closer to the (qe,exp) obtained from the experiment compared to the pseudo-first order model (Table 5). As a result, the pseudo-second order model was well obeyed by this adsorption system. Physisorption and chemisorption processes were assumed to provide the basis for the pseudo-first order model and pseudo-second order model, respectively (Singha B, et al. 2013). Therefore, RhB may have been adsorbed onto CL-PA-355 through a chemisorption process.
Weber and Morris intraparticle diffusion model: The equation described in previous work forms the basis of the intra-particle diffusion model (Safa Y, et al. 2011). In this document, the intra-article diffusion rate constant is expressed as Kpi (mg g−1 min 0.5). Table 5 shows Kpi and Ci determined from the slope and intercept of the plot of qt versus t 0.5. The adsorption process and rate control step were determined using this model. The sorbate adsorption on the interior of the adsorbent is mainly controlled by the steps of the adsorption process, which include (1) Film diffusion, (2) Intra-particle diffusion, (3) and the combination of the above steps (Wu J, et al. 2021). In this case, the graph of qt versus t 0.5 is a straight line that does not pass through the origin. According to this finding, intra-particle diffusion is not the only problem.
Intra-particle diffusion model | |||
---|---|---|---|
Kpi (mg g-1 min 0.5 ) | Ci | R2 | |
C0 (mg L-1) | |||
100 | 0.69 | 84.4 | 0.968 |
200 | 3.13 | 120.9 | 0.980 |
300 | 4.25 | 163.9 | 0.893 |
400 | 7.01 | 171.0 | 0.979 |
500 | 9.25 | 182.6 | 0.940 |
600 | 10.13 | 196.6 | 0.989 |
T (K) | |||
573 | 4.25 | 163.9 | 0.893 |
623 | 5.51 | 177.8 | 0.950 |
673 | 4.89 | 197.9 | 0.965 |
723 | 4.52 | 210.2 | 0.896 |
pH | |||
1.31 | 4.82 | 142.3 | 0.948 |
3.20 | 5.54 | 141.1 | 0.989 |
6.84 | 5.60 | 140.0 | 0.985 |
10.19 | 4.86 | 149.5 | 0.982 |
13.56 | 5.22 | 134.1 | 0.982 |
Table 5. Inta-particle diffusion model.
Adsorption isotherms
Adsorption isotherms provide important information that is useful for deducing adsorption mechanism and designing adsorption systems. The equilibrium data obtained at different initial RhB concentration, temperature and pH were analyzed by Langmuir and Freundlich model.
Langmuir isotherm: The Langmuir equation (Inyinbor AA, et al. 2015; Al-Saidi HM, et al. 2021) is given as:
Ce/qe=1/qmkL+Ceqm
Where Ce (mg L−1) denotes the equilibrium concentration of RhB in solution, qm (mg g−1) is the maximum adsorption capacity, kL (L mg−1) represents the Langmuir constant related to energy of adsorption. kL and qm are calculated from slop and intercept of the plot of Ce/qe versus Ce. The feasibility of adsorption process can be determined by separation factor RL, which is defined by:
RL=1/1+KLC0
Where C0 (mg L−1) is the initial RhB concentration, kL denotes the Langmuir constant mentioned above.
Freundlich isotherm: Freundlich is described as:
lnqe=lnkf+1/nlnCe
Table 6 provides a summary of the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm adsorption characteristics. The Langmuir isotherm model produced a higher correlation coefficient of 0.988 when compared to the Freundlich isotherm model. The Langmuir isotherm therefore provided a good fit for the experimental data, illuminating the fact that the RhB adsorption process comprised chemisorption and that the distribution of the adsorbent's surface adsorption sites and sorption energies was homogeneous. Additionally, the RL values obtained at various temperatures ranged from 0 to 1, indicating that RhB was successfully adsorbed on CL-PA-355.
Langmuir isotherm model | Freundlich isotherm model | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T (K) | qm (mg g-1 ) | kL (L mg-1 ) | R2 | RL | kf (L mg-1) | 1/n | R2 |
573 | 478.5 | 0.0259 | 0.988 | 0.11410 | 78.006 | 0.2909 | 0.941 |
623 | 478.5 | 0.0777 | 0.993 | 0.04115 | 135.263 | 0.2151 | 0.970 |
673 | 518.1 | 0.0669 | 0.997 | 0.04749 | 150.181 | 0.2097 | 0.968 |
723 | 518.1 | 0.0867 | 0.998 | 0.03701 | 174.300 | 0.1857 | 0.978 |
Table 6. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm constants.
This study had demonstrated that CL-PA-355 was an effective adsorbent for removal of RhB from aqueous solution. Both a low initial RhB concentration and a high temperature were benefit to RhB adsorption. pH value of solution only had a little effect on adsorption. Kinetics studies suggested that the adsorption mechanism of RhB followed the pseudo-second model well. Intra-particle diffusion was not the only rate controlling step. The equilibrium analysis reflected that the Langmuir model fitted isotherm date well. Therefore, it can be concluded that the CL-PA-355 based activated carbon is a promising adsorbent.
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
[Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]